Re: Newb question regarding cluster load balancing
- From: "Michael Weyant" <mweyant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:37:09 -0500
Thanks Geoff for the information. I thought as much but hoped otherwise.
"Geoff N. Hiten" <SQLCraftsman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e9dbmVrGGHA.3856@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> You can install multiple instances of SQL Server on a failover cluster.
> You cannot natively load-balance the workload between these multiple
> instances. They act as independent SQL servers. SQL Clustering is a
> failover technology and does not natively load balance.
>
> --
> Geoff N. Hiten
> Senior Database Administrator
> Microsoft SQL Server MVP
>
>
> "Michael Weyant" <mweyant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:OshvlPrGGHA.312@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Hello to all,
>>
>> I am currently working on creating a Windows 2003 server cluster (3
>> nodes) with the intent that it serve our web app which requires multiple
>> SQL databases. The question I have is this: How can I configure load
>> balancing for this? It seems that clustering services only allows 1 of
>> the nodes to access the DB at any given time (which is logical). If this
>> is true, how will I be able to leverage the processing power of the other
>> two nodes if they are idle while the node that is hosting the DB does all
>> the work?
>>
>> Any help would be appreciated.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>
>
.
- References:
- Newb question regarding cluster load balancing
- From: Michael Weyant
- Re: Newb question regarding cluster load balancing
- From: Geoff N. Hiten
- Newb question regarding cluster load balancing
- Prev by Date: Re: How many SQL 2000 nodes does Microsoft Officially Support on 2
- Next by Date: Re: How many SQL 2000 nodes does Microsoft Officially Support on 2
- Previous by thread: Re: Newb question regarding cluster load balancing
- Next by thread: Re: How many SQL 2000 nodes does Microsoft Officially Support on 2003?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|