Re: 4 node cluster
- From: "F" <F@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:15:38 -0800
Geoff,
Whats your email id ? I tried the one you used but it bounced straight back
"Geoff N. Hiten" <SRDBA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OeJ$Hmy$FHA.2256@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Yes. I have built and operated such a cluster. It takes some extra care
> in setting up operating procedures, but it does work. I do consider it a
> cost savings since I have 1/4 of the capacity as spare rather than 50%
> spare. Licensing is also pretty decent since you only need three servers
> worth of SQL licenses (on node is always "passive" therefore it meets the
> licensing terms.
>
> --
> Geoff N. Hiten
> Senior Database Administrator
> Microsoft SQL Server MVP
>
>
>
> "Hassan" <hassan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:%23cqDOHs$FHA.3372@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Has anyone set up a 4 node cluster i.e. 3 active and 1 passive ? I only
>> want to consider this as it may reduce cost. We have a lot of servers and
>> the least i want to do is have an active passive 2 node cluster for every
>> server thus doubling the server costs
>>
>> Do let me know what you have, whats recommended, whats ideal, whats right
>> ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 4 node cluster
- From: Geoff N. Hiten
- Re: 4 node cluster
- References:
- 4 node cluster
- From: Hassan
- Re: 4 node cluster
- From: Geoff N. Hiten
- 4 node cluster
- Prev by Date: Re: 2005 Cluster Install Error
- Next by Date: Re: Adding Second Virtual SQL Server Instance to a Cluster.
- Previous by thread: Re: 4 node cluster
- Next by thread: Re: 4 node cluster
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
