Re: Clustering and SA Role



You do have to remember too that Domain Admins, Enterprise Admins, User
Admins, and OU Admins have the ability to reset the passwords to user
accounts in the AD as well as add users to Global and Resource (Domain
Local?) Groups. So, again, it comes down to trust . . . and audits.

It helps if your Domain/Enterprise Administrators, Server Administrators,
Security Administrators, AD Administrators, Exchange Administrators, Web
Server Administrators, Application Server Administrators, Message Queue
Administrators, and SQL Server Administrators, etc., etc., etc., all be
managed by separate groups by managers of equal rank, all with elevated
privileges, all auditing the activities of the other groups: peer review,
within and throughout the organization to provide checks and balances to the
Change Control Process.

Sincerely,


Anthony Thomas


--

"Linchi Shea" <linchi_shea@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u3MQcxN6FHA.2888@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I guess the issue is that in SQL2000 one could remove local admin group
from
> the sysadmin role, thus preventing the server admin from easily and
> legitimately getting into SQL Server. So why can't we have that in
SQL2005?
>
> In practice, of course, I bet in many places one would find that the
> accounts of the DBAs are placed into a group and that group is granted
> access to SQL Server. So if a server admin really wants, he can add
himself
> to that group, thus gaining full access to SQL Server. So in the end, it
> does come down to trust. Trust for sure simplifies management in many
> scenarios. Without trust, one would have to go to excessive length to get
> things down or prevent things from happening. And in most places, I'd say
if
> you don't have trust, you have a bigger problem than keeping the server
> admin out of SQL Server.
>
> Nevertheless it's nice to, at least, have the option available to keep the
> server admin out, if necessary. Unfortunately, the cluster domain groups
> required in SQl2005 are not thoroughly documented in current SQL2005 BOL.
I
> underdstand that the December BOL refresh will have more materials on
these
> groups. I hope it can shed some light on the issue being discussed here.
>
> Linchi
>
> "Mike Epprecht (SQL MVP)" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:Ok%23Y3jN6FHA.2816@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Hi
> >
> > It comes down to processes within your organization and also how you
> > secure your AD.
> > You can grant someone to only manage objects in a certain tree, so not
> > giving them rights to the SQL Server accounts that should be in their
own
> > tree would be the correct way of doing it.
> >
> > Do you trust the same person not to give themselves Enterprise Admin
> > rights in the domain?
> >
> > Regards
> > --------------------------------
> > Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
> > Zurich, Switzerland
> >
> > IM: mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
> >
> > Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
> >
> > "Jay" <msnews.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > news:uf6d0$L6FHA.1148@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Sorry for the re-post.
> >>
> >> In a clustered SQL Server 2005 environment you must assign SQL Server,
> >> Agent
> >> and Full Text Search to domain groups. These groups then appear in the
> >> Sys
> >> Admin fixed role. With that, anyone who can add members to groups in
the
> >> domain can also become SQL Server SAs. How can this be prevented? I
> >> don't think anyone with ability/access to add members to groups (even
> >> domain admins) should be allowed to automatically make him/herself a
SQL
> >> SA be inheritance.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: software to control domain administrators
    ... "If I can't trust my admin he/she shouldn't be one" is an archaic school ... enterprise administrators are less and less common in favor of dividing ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • Re: Account to Run SQL under?
    ... you use AD Global Groups to grant the SQL Server DBAs administrative access, ... How to impede Windows NT administrators from administering a clustered ... with great power comes great responsibility. ... If you do not want local administrators to have system admin access rights then all you need to so is restrict the BUILTIN\Administrators rights. ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.server)
  • Re: Permissions
    ... Vince ... Doesn't even have to be an admin. ... More info in Books Online... ... > If you are sysadmin in SQL server, ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming)
  • Re: The Microsoft Search service cannot be administered under the present user accou
    ... When you changed the SQL-Service to run with Local User account (with admin ... rights), did you make this change in the SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Manager ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.fulltext)
  • NT Access Level for DBAs
    ... Our NT administrators won't grant DBA's more than a normal ... Unable to restart MS SQL Server / Agent Services ... access level DBA's require to be able to administer SQL ... I do not want to be an NT Admin, but I would like to be ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.security)