Re: SQL Failover problem.
From: C-Ya (CYa_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 02/18/05
- Next message: Joe Yong: "Re: Time of failover of Microsoft SQL 2000"
- Previous message: joe.: "Re: SQL Failover problem."
- In reply to: joe.: "Re: SQL Failover problem."
- Next in thread: Mike Hodgson: "Re: SQL Failover problem."
- Reply: Mike Hodgson: "Re: SQL Failover problem."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:01:18 -0800
Well guys, like magic it now works. I did do a lots of things so I probably
fixed it. Both instances will fail over to the other server and then
fail-back. I problem down.
Now I have another question. I have been told that I can have my web servers
make calls to the MSDTC, and it will pass the data back and forth to the
instances of SQL. This way my web servers don't have to know which instance
of SQL the database they need is in. Correct ??? If so where can I find
information on how to run it this way. Web sites, books, anything will help
Thanks
"joe." wrote:
> A few thoughts:
> 1. Have you tried a manual failover/move of your default instance without
> shutting down the machine?
> 2. Anything interesting in the event logs?
> 3. Do you have enough memory on server 1 to accomodate the default instance
> after the named instance is up and running?
>
>
> joe.
>
>
> "C-Ya" <C-Ya@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:283188D9-B426-4DD2-9ED3-2B3105438F9D@microsoft.com...
> >I have multiple (2) instances of sql 2000 running on my windows 2003
> >cluster.
> > I have the default instance owned by server1 and a named instance owner by
> > server 2. If I shutdown server 1 then my default instance fails over to
> > server2. Now server two is running both. (no problem). If I shutdown
> > server
> > 2 then my named instance fails over to server1, but my default instance
> > fails
> > and will only come up when server2 is back online. I have check all
> > dependencies. The physical disks, the SQL IP Address, and the SQL Network
> > Name stay online, just the SQL Server (and stuff dependant on it) fail.
> > This
> > is a new installation (just a few days old)
> >
> > Should I have done two named instances instead of a default and a named?
> >
> > One more bit of info. There is no problem with my Cluster Group or my DTC
> > Group failing over or failing back.
>
>
>
- Next message: Joe Yong: "Re: Time of failover of Microsoft SQL 2000"
- Previous message: joe.: "Re: SQL Failover problem."
- In reply to: joe.: "Re: SQL Failover problem."
- Next in thread: Mike Hodgson: "Re: SQL Failover problem."
- Reply: Mike Hodgson: "Re: SQL Failover problem."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|