Re: Transition from Stand-ALone SQL Server to Cluster
From: Mike Epprecht \(SQL MVP\) (mike_at_epprecht.net)
Date: 01/23/05
- Next message: dark_15: "Re: Transition from Stand-ALone SQL Server to Cluster"
- Previous message: dark_15: "Transition from Stand-ALone SQL Server to Cluster"
- In reply to: dark_15: "Transition from Stand-ALone SQL Server to Cluster"
- Next in thread: dark_15: "Re: Transition from Stand-ALone SQL Server to Cluster"
- Reply: dark_15: "Re: Transition from Stand-ALone SQL Server to Cluster"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 01:21:39 +0100
Hi
A Cluster is for high availability and not load balancing a single instance.
If you can put one DB on each node, you have a solution. If they have to run
on the same node, it won't help performance.
Make sure your hardware is on the Windows HCL for clustering, otherwise you
will just have a lot of trouble.
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/technologies/clustering/default.mspx
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evaluation/features/reliable.asp
Regards
--------------------------------
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
"dark_15" <dark_15@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:297A4A6B-2D86-4C52-85E1-B8660B32E9FF@microsoft.com...
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Here is my situation:
> I have stand alone sql server 2000 and with 2 databases. Unfortunately
> that server, which was supposed to be able to handle the workload of both
> database and database apps, is not able to do so. So I am looking into
> setting up something to distribute the workload between more servers. I
have
> two other servers coming along my way, as well as a SAN system for the
> storage of the SQL Data.
> So I am wondering if SQL clustering would be useful in this situation and,
> if so, what would I be looking at in configuring these servers? Right
now, I
> am just in the designing and planning stage, so I can change hardware and
> storage design if necessary.
>
> Thank you for your time.
- Next message: dark_15: "Re: Transition from Stand-ALone SQL Server to Cluster"
- Previous message: dark_15: "Transition from Stand-ALone SQL Server to Cluster"
- In reply to: dark_15: "Transition from Stand-ALone SQL Server to Cluster"
- Next in thread: dark_15: "Re: Transition from Stand-ALone SQL Server to Cluster"
- Reply: dark_15: "Re: Transition from Stand-ALone SQL Server to Cluster"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|