Re: Share Database with 2 SQL Servers.
From: Geoff N. Hiten (SRDBA_at_Careerbuilder.com)
Date: 05/21/04
- Next message: Thomas De Rousse: "Re: 'Virtual Server' option not available when installing SQL2000 on Win2003"
- Previous message: Mike: "Disable Fulltext"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Jack Victor: "Re: Share Database with 2 SQL Servers."
- Next in thread: Cathy Soloway: "RE: Share Database with 2 SQL Servers."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 12:48:05 -0400
Why would you need more than 900 bytes in an index key? Anything that large
really needs to go to full-text search instead.
-- Geoff N. Hiten Microsoft SQL Server MVP Senior Database Administrator Careerbuilder.com I support the Professional Association for SQL Server www.sqlpass.org "Jack Victor" <Nomail@JustPostReply.tv> wrote in message news:pan.2004.05.21.15.40.12.152000@JustPostReply.tv... > Damn! At least I know this ahead of time. Our db has almost no indexes > (just the primary keys really) and because of the 900 byte index limit I > can't create indexes on the fields that we would be frequently searching > on. But at least since have have few indexes and rows don't go through > multiple table joins, we should have high insert rates. > > I didn't know about sqlpass.org. Thanks for the tip! > > > On Fri, 21 May 2004 10:21:47 > -0400, Geoff N. Hiten wrote: > > > No. Each SQL Server\instance has exclusive control over its databases. >
- Next message: Thomas De Rousse: "Re: 'Virtual Server' option not available when installing SQL2000 on Win2003"
- Previous message: Mike: "Disable Fulltext"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Jack Victor: "Re: Share Database with 2 SQL Servers."
- Next in thread: Cathy Soloway: "RE: Share Database with 2 SQL Servers."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|