Re: Multi Instance Cluster Question
From: Geoff N. Hiten (SRDBA_at_Careerbuilder.com)
Date: 04/27/04
- Next message: Andrew J. Kelly: "Re: SQL 2005 (Yukon) question"
- Previous message: Ronald: "Multi Instance Cluster Question"
- In reply to: Ronald: "Multi Instance Cluster Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 19:46:36 -0400
Answer #1.
You can have one default instance and 15 named instances OR 16 named
instances of SQL per cluster. Each named instance will be
VirtualServerName\InstanceName. For consistancy I use only named
instances on a cluster, but that is just a personal thing.
Answer #2.
You may have an older version of MDAC on your client system. I think the
breakover is MDAC 2.6, but I may be wrong. Version 2.6 and higher
understand named instances. Versions before that do not. You can make an
older version connect to a named instance if you create an alias that
includes the port number.
-- Geoff N. Hiten Microsoft SQL Server MVP Senior Database Administrator Careerbuilder.com "Ronald" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:520a01c42ca8$dfdc9680$a301280a@phx.gbl... > I decided to try and setup a multi instance cluster on my > own and seem to be fairly successful . Its SQL 2000 EE on > Windows Server 2003 EE > > Just had 2 questions. When i installed the second > instance, it asked me for a virtual name.. so i gave it > one ..in my case SQL2.. and then was asked for an > instance name so i called it ins2.. Eventually this > second sql server is now called sql2\ins2 and not sql2 as > i had thought it would be.. The first instance which was > a default instance was named as SQL1 . Is this the right > way it should be ? i.e one instance called SQL1 and the > other SQL2\ins2 in my case. I was under the impression > that since its a virtual name i could get them to be > called SQL1 and SQL2 > > If not, then my next question is.. > > When i connect to those 2 virtual names from a client, it > seems to connect fine to SQL1 but when i connect to SQL2 > \ins2 it fails...with SQL Server does not exist or access > denied. Any reason why ? Thanks
- Next message: Andrew J. Kelly: "Re: SQL 2005 (Yukon) question"
- Previous message: Ronald: "Multi Instance Cluster Question"
- In reply to: Ronald: "Multi Instance Cluster Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|