Re: Active\Active Shared Database.
From: Linchi Shea (linchi_shea_at_NOSPAMml.com)
Date: 04/06/04
- Next message: Bjorn Mobak: "Move SQL Server cluster between SANs"
- Previous message: Linchi Shea: "Re: SAN questions"
- In reply to: Marx: "Active\Active Shared Database."
- Next in thread: Marx: "Re: Active\Active Shared Database."
- Reply: Marx: "Re: Active\Active Shared Database."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 00:53:50 -0400
Not possible with Microsoft Cluster Server, which follows a shared-nothing
model, meaning that the 'shared' disk is never accessed by more than one
node at any given time.
-- Linchi Shea linchi_shea@NOSPAMml.com "Marx" <marx.subramanian@corporate.ge.com> wrote in message news:E8E91910-8704-43C3-9947-6EE1D7298DBA@microsoft.com... > Hi > Is it possible in SQLServer to setup an Active/Active cluster between two servers and access the same database? > Like Oracle's Real Application Clusters, can this be achieved in sql may be using Federation? > > On a high level, i would have two sqlservers clustered, and i would federate the database horizontally and share my data across two > servers different databases. I will have Distributed Partitioned Views which will have a Union ALL of both data and reside on both databases. > The application will be smart enough to split the users across the servers and users will hit the servers concerned depending upon where > the data is. > > Is this possible or only two different application can work on an Active\Active configuration? > > thanks a bunch > Marx
- Next message: Bjorn Mobak: "Move SQL Server cluster between SANs"
- Previous message: Linchi Shea: "Re: SAN questions"
- In reply to: Marx: "Active\Active Shared Database."
- Next in thread: Marx: "Re: Active\Active Shared Database."
- Reply: Marx: "Re: Active\Active Shared Database."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|