Re: RADiest Client for SQL Server
From: Mike MacSween (mike.macsween.nospamplease_at_btinternet.com)
Date: 11/18/04
- Next message: Mike MacSween: "Re: RADiest Client for SQL Server"
- Previous message: Norman Yuan: "Re: RADiest Client for SQL Server"
- In reply to: Michael C: "Re: RADiest Client for SQL Server"
- Next in thread: Michael C: "Re: RADiest Client for SQL Server"
- Reply: Michael C: "Re: RADiest Client for SQL Server"
- Reply: Michael C: "Re: RADiest Client for SQL Server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:16:19 -0000
"Michael C" <mculley@NOSPAMoptushome.com.au> wrote in message
news:ufejehQzEHA.1396@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Ok, other's have listed a few reasons already but here's the first 10
> things I thought of. Most of these apply to any programming language (eg
> vb6, delphi etc).
OK, I'm aware that programming in a proper programming language gives you a
lot more control. I've done some work in VB6.
What advantages would I gain from using .net specifically? And which
language?
Mike
- Next message: Mike MacSween: "Re: RADiest Client for SQL Server"
- Previous message: Norman Yuan: "Re: RADiest Client for SQL Server"
- In reply to: Michael C: "Re: RADiest Client for SQL Server"
- Next in thread: Michael C: "Re: RADiest Client for SQL Server"
- Reply: Michael C: "Re: RADiest Client for SQL Server"
- Reply: Michael C: "Re: RADiest Client for SQL Server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|