Re: New to Merge/Replication
- From: "Tom Holmes Jr." <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 16:10:14 -0400
I agree. I can't wait for the Sync Services to come out. Not sure if I
can use the beta now since I need to have working code for clients soon.
Just a quick thought .... and maybe this is the wrong place to ask it ....
but can the Mobile Application open to the SQL Server or Access while it is
synced?
It's something I want to try out tonight.
Thanks again!
Tom
"Ginny Caughey [MVP]" <ginny.caughey.online@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8E0E5D7D-2921-482C-B860-C01F6C81E482@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bill,
I agree with this, although I've always used a custom sync solution since
not all my customers have the infrastructure for merge replication. With
SSC 3.1 I just copy the sdf file back and forth and work with it on the
desktop. But Sync Services seems well thought out and a better long term
solution.
--
Ginny
"William Vaughn" <billvaNoSPAM@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1B25203B-6B33-457F-86B2-24FB0D8342FE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ah, no, we interact with a lot of developers on a daily basis and I for
one have not heard a lot of complaints about IIS--whether or not it's
running alongside SQL Server. I do know of a lot of very large companies
(and a lot more small ones) using IIS and SQL Server on the same box. If
I were you I would work toward a Sync Services solution anyway. A few
months more and it will be released. From what I've seen the betas are
pretty stable in this regard.
hth
--
____________________________________
William (Bill) Vaughn
Author, Mentor, Consultant, Dad, Grandpa
Microsoft MVP
INETA Speaker
www.betav.com
www.betav.com/blog/billva
Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
__________________________________
Visit www.hitchhikerguides.net to get more information on my latest book:
Hitchhiker's Guide to Visual Studio and SQL Server (7th Edition)
and Hitchhiker's Guide to SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition (EBook)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Tom Holmes Jr." <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uwdHcQe1HHA.5980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hey William, or Bill, I'm just waiting for that Sync Services to come
out. The end of the year is going to be too long of a wait, and I need
some sort of Sync solution soon.
So, I'm looking at the PrimeWorks Data Port Sync, or SQLServerCE
software to come out. Thankfully it makes a direct connection to the
SDF file from the desktop.
Or, I may have to code something myself in the meantime ...
But, honestly .. has no one else raised a concern that IIS has to be on
the same evironment as SQL? Has no one else raised a concern when it
comes to security and security holes???
I certainly don't mean to go off on you or Ginny, you both have been
extremely helpful ... my anger and resentment is for Microsoft and the
monumentally stupid things they have
done over the years. That is why I do VB.NET stuff on the side, and my
day job has been Java/J2EE coding in a Linux/Unix environment for the
past 10 years. The companies
that I have worked for have really embraced open-source solutions over
proprietary ones ... and no one I know has regretted making those
decisions.
Anyway, I've got a couple of books of yours from back in the day
regarding VB and/or SQL Programming.
Thanks again to you and Ginny for all the help.
Tom
"William Vaughn" <billvaNoSPAM@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:E53C28CC-835E-404E-9B4F-408C5AF5886E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
ADO.NET 3.0 includes "Synchronization Services" that does not require
IIS. It is in beta (2) now and it's expected to RTM before the end of
the year.
--
____________________________________
William (Bill) Vaughn
Author, Mentor, Consultant, Dad, Grandpa
Microsoft MVP
INETA Speaker
www.betav.com
www.betav.com/blog/billva
Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
__________________________________
Visit www.hitchhikerguides.net to get more information on my latest
book:
Hitchhiker's Guide to Visual Studio and SQL Server (7th Edition)
and Hitchhiker's Guide to SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition (EBook)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Tom Holmes Jr." <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uHaw5$L1HHA.4816@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks for the information Ginny. I did download the BOL a while,
but never dug down into it until now .... and what I read was
disturbing:
"If this is the first publication created for this server, the
Publication Wizard prompts you to configure the default snapshot
folder location. The snapshot folder holds the snapshot files that
contain the schema and data for published tables. The IIS user must be
able to read these snapshot files so that it can download the files to
the smart device."
Is microsoft kidding me .... is this just the IIS
USER????????????????? Or does it appear that I need IIS Services (such
as FTP) running????????????????????????
Microsoft has got to be kidding me??????????????????????? As I've
stated before, and I think the entire World would agree with me ...
IIS is the biggest piece of garbage MS ever produced.
It's riddled with security holes and it is not to be trust at all ...
even with Anti-Virus software and firewalls. My clients are not
computer-saavy, they are local town or county government workers, and
they don't have technical people on staff. They are NOT going to be
running IIS and we don't want them to. What if IIS goes down?
How would they know? How are they gonna bring it back up without
calling me to BLAME ME that stuff isn't working now.
It was my deepest hope that Merge/Replication between SQL Compact
Edition and SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Edition would have it's own
sync services NOT dependent on IIS.
I'm sorry about the rant .... but is IIS really needed .... or can it
be avoided? Thanks!
Tom
"Ginny Caughey [MVP]" <ginny.caughey.online@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:99C7FD2C-4BC7-4752-9D95-066EC6062631@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tom,
The best reference on merge replication for SQL Compact is the SQL
2005 Compact Books Online. There is also some good info here:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/editions/compact/default.mspx
You can use merge replication with SQL Server on your main desktop
serving as the publisher with SQL Compact on PPC, TabletPC, or other
desktops as subscribers, so that would probably be the easiest
solution for you. You might also want to look at Sync Services for
ADO.Net, currently in beta:
http://blogs.msdn.com/stevelasker/archive/2007/03/18/QAforOCS_2D00_SyncServicesForAdoNet.aspx
--
Ginny
"Tom Holmes Jr." <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:elBuyaT0HHA.5408@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I will be developing some apps on a PPC with WM 5.0 and will have the
Compact Edition.
Similiarly, my client my have tablet PC's with either Compact
Edition, or Access, or SQL Server Express on it.
The main desktop will have the full blown SQL Server, probably 2005
or 2007 version.
I presume that I can use Merge/Replication for the sync merging.
As I have looked on here, with Compact Edition and the full SQL
Server you can do Merge/Replication. Where is the best place to
read up on merging/sync replication?
There are 3 scenarios I see, and the first two the most common:
1) there will be some tables for download only ... for lookups
2) Data will be uploaded from the PPC to the SQL Server, AND THEN I
want those records on the PDA to be expunged and deleted.
3) One table ... eventually may have to be really synced with both
records in SQL Server AND on the PDA.
Also ... what is the best way to do merge replication for the Tablet
PC. Should I use Compact Edition there also, SQL Server Express, or
Access. So long as they can do Merge/Replication to the main SQL
Server, that's great.
Thanks for any help!
Tom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New to Merge/Replication
- From: William Vaughn
- Re: New to Merge/Replication
- From: Ginny Caughey [MVP]
- Re: New to Merge/Replication
- References:
- Re: New to Merge/Replication
- From: Tom Holmes Jr.
- Re: New to Merge/Replication
- From: William Vaughn
- Re: New to Merge/Replication
- From: Tom Holmes Jr.
- Re: New to Merge/Replication
- From: William Vaughn
- Re: New to Merge/Replication
- From: Ginny Caughey [MVP]
- Re: New to Merge/Replication
- Prev by Date: Re: New to Merge/Replication
- Next by Date: Re: New to Merge/Replication
- Previous by thread: Re: New to Merge/Replication
- Next by thread: Re: New to Merge/Replication
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading