Re: 400 remote sites connected via DSL
- From: Nick SMS Administrator - Detroit, Mi <NickSMSAdministratorDetroitMi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 11:15:01 -0800
Steve,
Thanks for your response. I still don't know why I shouldn't setup 400
distribution points.
You said: " I would not go that route, I believe that it will become very
difficult to manage..."
How else can I control without purchasing something like the SMSNomad Branch
software. I was quoted 7.50 a license in packs of 500 licenses and I'm
looking to do this for free, so I can't purchase a solution.
I was able to setup an XP pro machine as an SMS "server share" site system
with the protected distribution point role. I think I'm all set now, but
your comment made me cast some doubt if I'm missing something here.
How else could I setup 400+ branch offices with no servers, only xp machines
connected to slow links?
"Steve Thompson" wrote:
"Nick SMS Administrator - Detroit, Mi" <Nick SMS Administrator - Detroit,.
Mi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:EA22C089-887F-40D9-A435-C3A674A64CFA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
SMS 2003 SP2
400+ remote locations connected via DSL lines of which the majority are
only
144Kbs.
5 clients (at most) in each site.
I am planning on deploying ITMU to all clients by setting up one client at
each remote site (roaming boundary) as a software distribution point
(server
share).
The control of bandwidth throttling is only available for secondary sites.
I do not think it would be a good idea to set over 400 secondary sites up
just for this feature.
2 questions.
1. Is setting up over 400 Server Shares a good idea.
2. If setting up that many server shares is okay, how can I throttle the
bandwidth.
Hi Nick,
Just replied to your other post in this group 'microsoft.public.sms.swdist'
I would not go that route, I believe that it will become very difficult to
manage...
Steve
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 400 remote sites connected via DSL
- From: Steve Thompson
- Re: 400 remote sites connected via DSL
- References:
- Re: 400 remote sites connected via DSL
- From: Steve Thompson
- Re: 400 remote sites connected via DSL
- Prev by Date: Re: 400 remote sites connected via DSL
- Next by Date: Re: package not loading/updating
- Previous by thread: Re: 400 remote sites connected via DSL
- Next by thread: Re: 400 remote sites connected via DSL
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading