Re: 400 remote sites connected via DSL
- From: "Steve Thompson" <stevethompson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 12:53:52 -0500
"Nick SMS Administrator - Detroit, Mi" <Nick SMS Administrator - Detroit,
Mi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:EA22C089-887F-40D9-A435-C3A674A64CFA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
SMS 2003 SP2
400+ remote locations connected via DSL lines of which the majority are
only
144Kbs.
5 clients (at most) in each site.
I am planning on deploying ITMU to all clients by setting up one client at
each remote site (roaming boundary) as a software distribution point
(server
share).
The control of bandwidth throttling is only available for secondary sites.
I do not think it would be a good idea to set over 400 secondary sites up
just for this feature.
2 questions.
1. Is setting up over 400 Server Shares a good idea.
2. If setting up that many server shares is okay, how can I throttle the
bandwidth.
Hi Nick,
Just replied to your other post in this group 'microsoft.public.sms.swdist'
I would not go that route, I believe that it will become very difficult to
manage...
Steve
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 400 remote sites connected via DSL
- From: Nick SMS Administrator - Detroit, Mi
- Re: 400 remote sites connected via DSL
- Prev by Date: Re: Distribution point on a workgroup client
- Next by Date: Re: 400 remote sites connected via DSL
- Previous by thread: Re: Distribution point on a workgroup client
- Next by thread: Re: 400 remote sites connected via DSL
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|