Re: Additional suggestions for previous post "Distribution Manager error 2324 1/4/05"??
From: John Guderian (lanadmin_at_avrinc.com)
Date: 01/24/05
- Next message: Ryan: "Re: Is there a Office 2003 with SP1 CD available yet??"
- Previous message: Shehzad Khoja [MSFT]: "Re: Moving location of stored packages gracefully!?"
- In reply to: Jim Bradbury [MSFT]: "Re: Additional suggestions for previous post "Distribution Manager error 2324 1/4/05"??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:40:37 -0700
Jim,
Thanks for looking. If you do get a chance to rebuild your environment, I
would definately be interested in having those Share permisisons, and NTFS
permissions that are "out of the box".
I have done several searches, and also couldnt find any documentation
regarding default share & NTFS permissions. If you do come across something,
I would like to have the link, or a copy for furture reference.
Thanks again,
John
"Jim Bradbury [MSFT]" <jimbrad@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:O1V6ur1$EHA.3908@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> John,
>
> I'm not looking at a site right now, but I checked the other SMS shares
> yesterday and on my SMS 2003 SP1 site (on Windows 2003), all of the shares
> that you indicated have Everyone with Full Control listed. However, I
> didn't look closely at the file permissions.
>
> Note: I don't recall the specific history of my site (one of many VPC
> images), so this certainly isn't a definitive statement of the default
> settings. Unfortunately, I couldn't find any current documentation
> regarding the specific share and file permissions, which have changed a
> over the course of various SMS Service Packs.
>
> Since Shezahd has some different thoughts on the default SMS share
> permissions, I should probably setup a clean SMS site before posting more
> share/file permissions listings. I won't be able to setup a clean site
> tomorrow (Friday), but I will try to get to it on Monday and post my
> findings.
>
> I'm glad that changing the package share permissions resolved your
> problem.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Jim Bradbury
> This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties and confers no rights.
>
> "John Guderian" <lanadmin@avrinc.com> wrote in message
> news:unN65dy$EHA.3700@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> SMS 2003 is installed on a Windows 2003 box, which as you stated has
>> default share permissions of Read to 'Everyone'. However after changing
>> the 'Everyone' permission to Full Control, everything started to work,
>> including the import of .pdf files, and .sms files. All the NTFS
>> permissions are the same.
>>
>> If SMS doesnt alter Share permissions, my existing share permission set
>> of Read Only would have worked. I havent changed any of the NTFS
>> permissions.
>>
>> I would still like to verify the permissions that I have to ensure they
>> are correct, and that security is maintained. I have run the aclreset.exe
>> command in the past based off of a microsoft suggestion.
>>
>> Can you provide the share, and NTFS permissions so that I can verify what
>> I currently have?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> "Shehzad Khoja [MSFT]" <srkhoja@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:%23S9Fy2x$EHA.2180@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>>> SMS doesn't force any share permissions. By default, all shares are set
>>> to have full permissions for 'Everyone' on Win2k and Read to 'Everyone'
>>> on Win2k3.
>>> It is the NTFS permissions which actually contorl who gets what?
>>>
>>> --
>>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
>>> rights.
>>>
>>>
>>> "John Guderian" <lanadmin@avrinc.com> wrote in message
>>> news:uwNxjjw$EHA.1264@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>>>> Well simply changing the share permission on the SMSPKGD$ folder for
>>>> the everyone group to full control made all the difference. All of a
>>>> sudden my errors went away, and the package copied to the distribution
>>>> point. I decided to change all of the SMS share permissions to everyone
>>>> full control, and I can now import .pdf files as well which wasnt
>>>> happening before.
>>>>
>>>> However, would you mind verifying the exact share & file permissions
>>>> for the 5 SMS shares below?
>>>>
>>>> CAP_"site name"
>>>> SMS_"site name"
>>>> SMS_SITE
>>>> SMS_SUIAgent
>>>> SMSClient
>>>>
>>>> I appreciate your help!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Jim Bradbury [MSFT]" <jimbrad@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:eauPWan$EHA.2444@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>>>>> As was suggested in a previous post, I would also suggest enabling NAL
>>>>> logging to get specific information on the error that is occurring.
>>>>> NAL logging is valid for both SMS 2.0 and SMS 2003, at least for this
>>>>> component.
>>>>>
>>>>> A quick glance at my SMS 2003 SP1 site shows:
>>>>> - Share permissions of Everyone at Full Control
>>>>> - File permissions of Administrators at Full Control and Guests and
>>>>> Users at Read & Execute.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, I can't remember whether this was an upgrade (2.0 -> 2003
>>>>> RTM -> 2003 SP1) or a clean installation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Based on your earlier comment, I would suggest checking your share
>>>>> permissions (and enabling NAL logging).
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Jim Bradbury
>>>>> This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties and confers no
>>>>> rights.
>>>>>
>>>>> "John Guderian" <lanadmin@avrinc.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:ebC7bum$EHA.3820@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>I have an additionl thread below that seems to have been abandoned,
>>>>>>however my last response indicates where I left off. This post is
>>>>>>dated 1/4/05.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am still running into issues with this error, and trying to import
>>>>>> .sms, or .pdf files do not work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any help would be greatly appreciated. Currently the software
>>>>>> distribution feature is at a stand still. Is there any way to
>>>>>> re-install the distribution point to a default install if this cant
>>>>>> be fixed?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
- Next message: Ryan: "Re: Is there a Office 2003 with SP1 CD available yet??"
- Previous message: Shehzad Khoja [MSFT]: "Re: Moving location of stored packages gracefully!?"
- In reply to: Jim Bradbury [MSFT]: "Re: Additional suggestions for previous post "Distribution Manager error 2324 1/4/05"??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|