Re: Changing Site Boundaries

This makes much more sense, thank you. I have done some testing sense you
responded.

I changed my site boundaries for the fourth floor to 10.4.1.0 and 10.4.2.0.
I removed the SMS agent from some clients, then discovered them and
successfully pushed the SMS agent to the clients.

When I look at the properties of the clients from within the SMS console the
IP Subnet says 10.4.0.0. It does not say 10.4.1.0 or 10.4.2.0.

Do you know where it gets this IP Subnet information? Our subnets are
defined in AD. Is that where it's getting this data?




"Kim Oppalfens [MVP]" <""Kim dot Oppalfen" wrote:


First thing to remember when using subnets is that sms is doing nothing
more than string comparison so you can't use 10.4.0.0 to be able to
assign 10.4.1.0 and 10.4.2.0 clients. You need to add the 2 subnets to
the site boundaries to have clients in both subnets assigned.

Now as to your concern about subnet 10.4.5.0, in your suggested
configuration SMS would never push the agent to any of the systems in
this subnet. But if you right-clicked a collection or a computer and
selected to install the client from the context menu, then SMS might
install the client assuming you deselected the checkbox to only push to
assigned resources (which is on by default).

Does that make more sense?

As to
Galen wrote:
Can you clarify this for me? As an example, I had configured the previous
site boundary for our 4th floor to correspond to the subnet, 10.4.0.0. All
clients on this floor have IP's beginning with either a 10.4.1.x or 10.4.2.x
address.

I'd like to not allow SMS to communicate with machines on the 10.4.5.x
subnet.

I assumed I could change the site boundaries to 10.4.1.0 and 10.4.2.0 thus
blocking access to 10.4.5.x addresses.

I understand now that this is incorrect. Can you help me understand this
better?

Thanks again for your time.

"Kim Oppalfens [MVP]" <""Kim dot Oppalfen" wrote:

Galen wrote:
I have SMS 2003 SP2 setup on a W2k3 platform. I have one site with only
advanced clients. This site has been functioning for some time.

I setup the site boundaries by VLan. In this case it's been 10.x.0.0. The
"x" is the floor number the machine is on. I receivied a request to modify
this configuration so that the boundaries would now be 10.x.1.0 ro 10.x.2.0.
The reason being is that there are machines on two other VLans that should
not be a in communication with SMS.

I've implemented this change and I have noticed some problems that I'm
having a hard to resolving.

1. Software Distribution - The CAS logs on the client error out because
with No Matching DP Location Found
I have updated the DP successfully.
I can also push out the client successfully.
I am receiving all hardware/software inventories

I'm puzzled as to why only software distribution has been affected.

I sure appreciate your time in responding.

Thanks
Software distribution is affected because that is looking for a local
resource. The clients now fall outside of the boundaries of your site,
but are Manually assigned to it at install, so they find the resources
to do everything else.

--
"Everyone is an expert at something"
Kim Oppalfens - Sms Expert for lack of any other expertise
Windows Server System MVP - SMS
http://www.blogcastrepository.com/blogs/kim_oppalfenss_systems_management_ideas/default.aspx



--
"Everyone is an expert at something"
Kim Oppalfens - Sms Expert for lack of any other expertise
Windows Server System MVP - SMS
http://www.blogcastrepository.com/blogs/kim_oppalfenss_systems_management_ideas/default.aspx

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SMS Advance Client not assigned to the site
    ... Not only have I added the SMSSite (which includes all the 3 subnets that were configured in AD Sites & Services) in the Site Boundaries, but also added 3 subnets individually on top of that. ... After doing this I ran the AD System Discovery and then updated the collection but still no clients got assigned to the site. ... Now since there was no way of knowing when sms 2003 went rtm which client you would install. ...
    (microsoft.public.sms.admin)
  • Re: Changing Site Boundaries
    ... SMS has been working great. ... Site Boundaries are setup using IP Subnets. ... subnet for all servers. ... Office using a known good package but the clients could not Locate the DP. ...
    (microsoft.public.sms.setup)
  • Re: SMS Advance Client not assigned to the site
    ... Legacy clients are assigned based site boundaries, advanced clients are assigned based on roaming boundaries. ... By configuring site boundaries, you by default also configure roaming boundaries. ... Now since there was no way of knowing when sms 2003 went rtm which client you would install. ... If you want to solve this without starting to push to "unassigned resources" than you could add your 3 ip subnets to the subnet boundaries. ...
    (microsoft.public.sms.admin)
  • Re: Changing Site Boundaries
    ... SMS has been working great. ... Site Boundaries are setup using IP Subnets. ... We also have a separate subnet for all servers. ... They were trying to rollout Office using a known good package but the clients could not Locate the DP. ...
    (microsoft.public.sms.setup)
  • Re: Changing Site Boundaries
    ... SMS is seeing the site topology I have setup in AD. I've ... Site Boundaries are setup using IP Subnets. ... subnet for all servers. ... Office using a known good package but the clients could not Locate the DP. ...
    (microsoft.public.sms.setup)
Loading