Re: Move SMS 2003 to another server



"Matt Hendrickson" <MattHendrickson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:D4323363-4B38-40D2-9686-F017771EBA2E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
There are two ways you can go with a new install; since you have a number
of
clients already assigned, it may make sense to install SMS with the same
site code as defined before.

Are there any negatives to reinstalling SMS with the existing site code?
We
are in a similar situation at my company (thousands of existing clients,
new
SMS central server with new server name) and I talked to an MS rep who
recommended changing the site code to avoid issues. I'd like to avoid
changing the site code, if possible.

If you have extended Active Directory with the SMS extensions it will work
fine keeping the same site code (I've done it). I've seen some issues with
re-installing SMS, using the same site code, with clients not obtaining a
valid certificate in a non-extended AD environment. Perhaps that's why your
MS contact recommended the change...

As I mentioned in another recent posting, one of the advantages of changing
the site code, it's easy to tell that you are assimilating the clients into
the new environment. There are other techniques you can use to determine the
health of SMS clients, however all require a little more expertise.

Steve


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: SMS clients / Site boundaries
    ... because if are different site code you can just change the the site ... MVP Windows Server System - SMS ... Most of our subnets are dedicated in the company, ... but I have at least 50 clients that are physically connected to subnets ...
    (microsoft.public.sms.admin)
  • Re: How difficult is it to move to a new site/server
    ... 'Insert your new site code below instead of AAA ... >>> have the advanced client. ... >>> partner with another unitcollege that has an AD environment. ... >>> decomissioned my SMS server, how difficult would it be for the client ...
    (microsoft.public.sms.setup)
  • Re: Move SMS 2003 to another server
    ... it may make sense to install SMS with the same ... Are there any negatives to reinstalling SMS with the existing site code? ... are in a similar situation at my company (thousands of existing clients, ...
    (microsoft.public.sms.setup)
  • Re: SMS 2003 and Site Names
    ... You should give your 2003 site a new site code. ... with the same site code in the same hierarchy. ... SMS 2003 can have the same ... > conventions of my current secondary sites? ...
    (microsoft.public.sms.setup)
  • Re: Two Primary Sites
    ... > We have two primary SMS 2003 sites within a forest that consists of one SMS ... > assigned to the vast majority of the clients. ... > the client specifiying the site code but the site code is never assigned. ... it shows that it is supposed to be assigned to DET but the assignment ...
    (microsoft.public.sms.setup)

Loading