Re: Inplace Upgrade os SMS2.0 to 2003
- From: "Paul" <Paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 04:47:04 -0700
Kim,
On the Package issue, is there a way of comparing the packages installed on
the distribution points so I know which ones need updating?
Thanks
Paul
"Kim Oppalfens" wrote:
>
> I'll comment inline.
> In article <E469A059-F39E-42D4-8F7E-9EA4B68DEEEE@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> >
> > Currently our SMS 2.0 Installation consists of a Central Site Server and one
> > Primary Child Site Server; both of these servers are in different locations
> > and are connected by a WAN link. Both servers have the following roles,
> > Client Access Point, Component Server, Distribution Point, Site Server and
> > SQL Server. On the Central Site server there are roughly 700+ clients, a
> > mixture of Windows 95, 98, NT4.0, 2000 Server & Pro, XP and 2003 Server. On
> > the Primary Child Site there are roughly 170+ clients; again a mixture of
> > Windows 95, 98, NT4.0, 2000 Server & Pro, XP and 2003 Server. Also there are
> > around 90 packages and 40 Advertisements . In the central site there is also
> > another server that is being used as a SMS Distribution Point.
> >
> > I recently ran the Deployment Readiness Wizard on both the Central Site and
> > Primary Site server and when reviewing the log it has discovered some issues,
> > for example.
> >
> > Several machines have unsupported Operating Systems; this I think is due to
> > the installed client not reporting the OS back to the SMS database.
>
> That could be the case, or you might have machines running windows 95
> which are not supported.
> >
> > It has detected a lot of inactive clients, presumable I can remove these and
> > let SMS 2003 rediscover.
> Yups.
> >
> > I also have quite a few clients reporting Duplicate Client Id�s.
> You can better clean these up as well.
> >
> > One of the Distribution Points has out-of-date packages
> Easiest solution would be to remove the distribution point and reinstall
> it once the sms 2003 site is up. This will come with a pretty high
> network load since all packages need to be copied over again.
>
> Cleanest solution would be to solve the distribution point issue before
> upgrading.
>
> I am not quite sure which one to advise, guess it depends on the speed
> of the network and the number & size of the packages.
>
>
> >
> > A lot of the problems, especially the unsupported O/S, seem to be where the
> > Client software hasn�t reported back the correct information.
> >
> > My main questions on the upgrade are:
> >
> > Site Boundaries � Are these retained or do I have to write down all of the
> > existing site boundaries? Can overlapping Site boundaries be used?, I have
> > some clients that are at each site that sit on the same IP subnet.
> >
> Site boundaries should be retained after the upgrade. To be sure you
> could install the sms2.0 admin feature pack and export the
> siteboundaries using the siteboun tool.
>
> Two different sms2003 sites cannot have overlapping boundaries.
>
> > Servers � What order do I need to upgrade?, Central Site first or Child Site?
> Top to bottom, in other words central first, followed by child sites,
> grandchild sites,....
> >
> > Clients � How do I go about upgrading all the Windows 2000 or above clients
> > to the Advance Client, will this be done automatically when SMS is upgraded?
> > Do I need to upgrade the clients before I perform the Upgrade of the Servers?
>
> This depends on whether you plan to upgrade to sms 2003 rtm or sp1.
> In rtm clients will be upgraded to legacy clients, and you should
> upgrade them yourself to advanced clients.
>
> In SP1 clients no longer upgrade automatically and you can upgrade them
> directly to SP1 advanced clients using client push, software
> distribution, manual or login script based installation, or GPO
> deployment.
>
> >
> > Packages/Advertisements � Are these retained or upgraded?
> Packages & advertisements should be retained.
> >
> > Is there any other advice you can give
> Make sure you have a decent sms backup just in case, and test your
> procedure in a lab environment.
> >
> > Many Thanks
> >
>
> --
> Kim Oppalfens
> MVP SMS
> Computacenter Belgium
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Inplace Upgrade os SMS2.0 to 2003
- From: Kim Oppalfens
- Re: Inplace Upgrade os SMS2.0 to 2003
- References:
- Inplace Upgrade os SMS2.0 to 2003
- From: Paul
- Re: Inplace Upgrade os SMS2.0 to 2003
- From: Kim Oppalfens
- Inplace Upgrade os SMS2.0 to 2003
- Prev by Date: Re: Inplace Upgrade os SMS2.0 to 2003
- Next by Date: Re: Inplace Upgrade os SMS2.0 to 2003
- Previous by thread: Re: Inplace Upgrade os SMS2.0 to 2003
- Next by thread: Re: Inplace Upgrade os SMS2.0 to 2003
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|