Re: SMS capacity planning
From: Kim Oppalfens (kim_at_computacenter.nospam)
Date: 03/01/05
- Previous message: Kim Oppalfens: "Re: 2003 Doesn't Work"
- In reply to: Schweeeet: "SMS capacity planning"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 21:44:10 +0100
For the remote sites, if you have a server there install a secondary
site.
1) Secondary server licenses are free
2) They require minimal management since all advanced clients are
assigned to the parent primary
3) They provide you with much better control over your wan traffic.
So, no costs, almost zero management overhead, but quite some benefits.
Kim
In article <BF2747B8-88DA-42D1-878A-63139495ABB7@microsoft.com>,
Schweeeet@discussions.microsoft.com says...
> I need to setup SMS 2003 in my environment. I am having problems coming up
> with what i need to put in place to support the capacity i need.
>
> We have a corporate office with about 250 machines that will be managed, our
> domain is all 2003 dc's and we also have 150 WAN sites connected with a
> minimum of 256k links. The sites range in size from 5 client pc's to 100
> client pc's. Each WAN site has appropriate bandwidth according to how many
> clients are at the site. So our larger sites have full or half T1's. We have
> a total of 5000 clients that will be managed with SMS.
>
> Any thoughts??
>
>
-- Kim Oppalfens Proud father of Lennart Oppalfens Since 05/11/2004 08.53 GMT+1
- Previous message: Kim Oppalfens: "Re: 2003 Doesn't Work"
- In reply to: Schweeeet: "SMS capacity planning"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
