Re: SMS 2.0 Client on Domain controller fails error 1069
From: John Graham (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 07/22/04
- Next message: Kirk Halliday: "Distribution Point on a DC"
- Previous message: Tom: "Re: Extend AD Schmena"
- In reply to: Michael Poling [MSFT]: "Re: SMS 2.0 Client on Domain controller fails error 1069"
- Next in thread: Michael Poling [MSFT]: "Re: SMS 2.0 Client on Domain controller fails error 1069"
- Reply: Michael Poling [MSFT]: "Re: SMS 2.0 Client on Domain controller fails error 1069"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 10:30:20 -0700
Opened Default Domain Controller Security Policy tab under
Administrative Tools.
Log On as a Service is marked as "Not Defined"
AD Users & Computers - Domain COntrollers tab indicates
that I am using Default Domain Controllers Group Policy.
Also Note: Both Northglenn and Southglenn have the same
policy settings. Northglenn installed, Southflenn did not!
What would cause one domain controller to install the
client but prohibit the other.
Both machines are on the same subnet, same domain.
Another question: During the installation, the account
SMS#_Southglenn is created. The CCMBoot service is
created, errors out, but then the account and the service
are both deleted. Is there any way to prevent the deletion
so that the permissions issue could be troubleshot?
>-----Original Message-----
>The error 1069 is "The service did not start due to a
logon failure."
>
>I have seen issues where the Default Domain Controller
Security Policy has
>been disabled and replaced by a custom policy, or
modified where SMS is not
>able to modify it.
>
>If this is the case try adding SMSInternalCliGrp to
the "Logon as a Service"
>permission in your Domain Controller Security Policy or
enable the Default
>Domain Controller Security Policy.
>
>This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
confers no rights.
>
>"John Graham" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote
in message
>news:16dd01c46f45$84ea7140$a601280a@phx.gbl...
>> Running SMS V2.0 sp5.
>> Trying to install SMS client using NT Remote Client
>> Installation method on a pair of AD Domain controllers.
>> The first server installation succeeded without any
>> problems. The second server fails with the following
error
>> in ccm.log
>> ------
>> $$<SMS_CLIENT_CONFIG_MANAGER><Wed Jul 21 08:16:55.725
2004
>> Alaskan Daylight Time><thread=2808 (0xAF8)>
>> ---> Sync part #1: Account is in the local
administrators
>> group (still need account properties sync locally)...
>> $$<SMS_CLIENT_CONFIG_MANAGER><Wed Jul 21 08:17:54.864
2004
>> Alaskan Daylight Time><thread=3456 (0xD80)>
>> ---> Synced! User comment set to "SMS#_SOUTHGLENN
>> PDC:\\NORTHGLENN Svr=SOUTHGLENN @ 07-21-2004, 08:16.54"
>> locally $$<SMS_CLIENT_CONFIG_MANAGER><Wed Jul 21
>> 08:17:54.880 2004 Alaskan Daylight Time><thread=3456
>> (0xD80)>
>> ---> Created service "CCMBoot" on machine "SOUTHGLENN".
>> $$<SMS_CLIENT_CONFIG_MANAGER><Wed Jul 21 08:17:54.927
2004
>> Alaskan Daylight Time><thread=3456 (0xD80)>
>> ---> ERROR: Unable to start service "CCMBoot" on
>> machine "SOUTHGLENN", error = 1069.
>> $$<SMS_CLIENT_CONFIG_MANAGER><Wed Jul 21 08:17:54.943
2004
>> Alaskan Daylight Time><thread=3456 (0xD80)>
>> ---> Waiting for service to stop
>> $$<SMS_CLIENT_CONFIG_MANAGER><Wed Jul 21 08:17:54.943
2004
>> Alaskan Daylight Time><thread=3456 (0xD80)>
>> ---> Service stopped $$<SMS_CLIENT_CONFIG_MANAGER><Wed
>> Jul 21 08:17:59.942 2004 Alaskan Daylight
>> Time><thread=3456 (0xD80)>
>> ---> Failed to start the CCM Client Bootstrap service on
>> SOUTHGLENN (1069) $$<SMS_CLIENT_CONFIG_MANAGER><Wed Jul
>> 21 08:17:59.942 2004 Alaskan Daylight Time><thread=3456
>> (0xD80)>
>> ---> Service "CCMBoot" on machine "SOUTHGLENN"
>> successfully deleted. $$<SMS_CLIENT_CONFIG_MANAGER><Wed
>> Jul 21 08:17:59.989 2004 Alaskan Daylight
>> Time><thread=3456 (0xD80)>
>> ---> Failed to install CCM Client Bootstrap component on
>> client (1069) $$<SMS_CLIENT_CONFIG_MANAGER><Wed Jul 21
>> 08:18:00.005 2004 Alaskan Daylight Time><thread=3456
>> (0xD80)>
>>
>> -----
>> Please note that these servers (Northglenn and
Southglenn)
>> are set up identically!
>
>
>.
>
- Next message: Kirk Halliday: "Distribution Point on a DC"
- Previous message: Tom: "Re: Extend AD Schmena"
- In reply to: Michael Poling [MSFT]: "Re: SMS 2.0 Client on Domain controller fails error 1069"
- Next in thread: Michael Poling [MSFT]: "Re: SMS 2.0 Client on Domain controller fails error 1069"
- Reply: Michael Poling [MSFT]: "Re: SMS 2.0 Client on Domain controller fails error 1069"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|