Re: client.msi VS ccmsetup.exe
From: Mike Church [MSFT] (mchurch_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 07/08/04
- Next message: Chris: "SMS2003 Child Site and SMS 2.0 SP5 Parent Site"
- Previous message: David Kroll: "Re: SMS_SITE_COMPONENT error"
- In reply to: ronen: "client.msi VS ccmsetup.exe"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 09:06:32 -0700
Using ccmsetup is the recomended method, it will create a folder on the
client (ccmsetup) and copy the client.msi to that folder. By running the
installation from the local machine the MSI is present if you need to
upgrade or apply a patch to the client. Ccmsetup also creates logs in that
same folder for investigation of any installation or upgrade issues.
-- "This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties and confers no rights." "ronen" <ronen@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:063507F8-D569-4215-B7FD-A0EB31F866D3@microsoft.com... > hi > > is there a problem installing manualy the sms2003 advanced client on my > systems with client.msi? > do i need to use only ccmsetup.exe? > i heard that installing with client.msi could couse problems when traying > to upgrade the sms client. > > thanks for the help.
- Next message: Chris: "SMS2003 Child Site and SMS 2.0 SP5 Parent Site"
- Previous message: David Kroll: "Re: SMS_SITE_COMPONENT error"
- In reply to: ronen: "client.msi VS ccmsetup.exe"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
