Re: Another Best Practice Questioen
From: Evan [MSFT] (esc_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 06/24/04
- Next message: Evan [MSFT]: "Re: sms site hierarchy did not show up any site code"
- Previous message: SMSMan: "Re: Roaming Boundaries"
- In reply to: BET: "Another Best Practice Questioen"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:05:31 -0700
No doubt the reason they don't install is that SMS 2003 RTM does not support
computers in workgroups - they must belong to a domain. However...
SMS 2003 SP1 (when it is released) provides limited support for computers in
a workgroup, with the following conditions and exceptions.
Workgroup support is for Advanced Clients only.
Clients must use NetBIOS for name resolution.
Administrative user rights on the computer are required to installing the
SMS client software.
Active Directory discovery and user targeting is not supported.
Advertisements targeted to Active Directory objects, users, or user groups
is not supported.
Global roaming is not supported.
-- This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. "BET" <BET@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:566B40CE-0791-4DFC-9D2B-FC9C142FE8E3@microsoft.com... > What is the best approach? > > I have a single site. The site is using advance security and all clients are Windows2000 & XP Pro. I have setup a test lab before going to production. The question is we have several remote sites using fractional T1's and no secondaries installed. I am having great problems discovering the remote clients. The remote clients are not part of AD, they are configured for a workgroup. So in my lab I pointed the workgroup clients to the WINS server which is on the two DNS servrers. I discovered the one client but did not get a completed component installation. The System Management icon in control panel showed that not all components installed. In addition the Site code was not populated. Now at the site system you could see it was assigned to the site. So I manually entered the site code and applied this setting. Next I repaired the installation on the client which is a XP Pro. I could see that the remote client registry was being increased by the CCMSETUP script. > > My question is what is the best practice for handling this remote client? should I recommend going with a secondary. Would this help discover and better install my workgroup clients? I not sure my client will want to spend the money to put servers at each location. But if that is my only route then that is what I would like to present to them. If there are better options please share them with me. > > One other thing each site only have 4 or five client the most. > > thanks, > > Bill
- Next message: Evan [MSFT]: "Re: sms site hierarchy did not show up any site code"
- Previous message: SMSMan: "Re: Roaming Boundaries"
- In reply to: BET: "Another Best Practice Questioen"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading