Re: Assigned = yes installed=no different subnets,site and domain
From: Evan [MSFT] (esc_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 06/23/04
- Next message: sms1: "sms site hierarchy did not show up any site code"
- Previous message: Evan [MSFT]: "Re: Assigned = yes installed=no different subnets,site and domain"
- In reply to: JOEY REGO: "Re: Assigned = yes installed=no different subnets,site and domain"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:18:17 -0700
Afraid I'm not the one to ask about that, but here's a link that may help:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/sus/wuscomparison.mspx
-- This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. "JOEY REGO" <JOEYREGO@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:4051158E-CAB2-48AF-B070-A278B0F7C3CF@microsoft.com... > For one the staff machines h+ave a differents naming scheme and two they also have a different IP Scheme. SO your saying a nother indivudual site for the students right. Do you think its worth it? should i just bring up an SUS server for the software updates and use vnc to manage them remotely? Let me know your thoughts > > "Evan [MSFT]" wrote: > > > It is not supported for a site in one forest to have site systems in another > > forest. You must either have both domains in the same forest, or install > > another sms site in the other forest to manage the clients in that forest. > > Curious - how do you propose to distinguish your machines from others that > > you don't want to manage if they're in the same boundaries? > > > > -- > > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. > > "JOEY REGO" <JOEYREGO@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > > news:F79C9C63-93E6-4D72-B649-975EEA98EDE9@microsoft.com... > > > I am Using 2003 and i am trying to install the advanced client. I am > > using the Client push technology on both the staff ans student machines. > > What exactly would I be looking for in the DDM.log file? These domains are > > in two separate forests. Is this a problem? Will i be able to install the > > client and manage them. Here is the thing. What i want to do is be able to > > push software and security updates to our staff and the student client > > machines that are only ours. > > > No i do not have a SLP Server Locater Point. thats what it stands for > > right? Would i need to implement one in my scenario? > > > > > > I really appreciate your help. I will be awaiting your response. > > > > > > "Evan [MSFT]" wrote: > > > > > > > What version of sms? > > > > If sms 2003, are you trying to install legacy or advanced client? > > > > What method are you using to try to install the student domain machines? > > If > > > > using auto-push, check ddm.log on site server, as it is the one that > > > > generates a ccr to start the push whenever it receives a ddr that's in > > the > > > > boundary. Then check ccm.log on the site server, as it is the one > > actually > > > > doing the push when it gets the ccr.. > > > > Are the domains in same or different AD forests? > > > > Do you have a SLP installed? > > > > > > > > You can use the Delete Inactive Client Discovery Data task under > > Database > > > > Maintenance \ Tasks to get rid of clients that no longer exist. It > > > > deletes all clients that have not sent a ddr within the number of days > > > > specified in the task's Properties dialog. Since they will still exist > > in > > > > AD, the task ignores DDRs from the SMS_AD_SYSTEM_DISCOVERY_AGENT (ie AD > > > > System Discovery) since otherwise AD System Discovery would add them > > back > > > > the next time it ran. So you don't need to clean up AD for this purpose > > if > > > > you don't want to. Note that if you're using auto-push, ddm won't > > generate a > > > > ccr for nt4 boxes discovered by AD System Discovery since the AD info > > > > doesn't include whether it's a workstation or server for nt4 (and you > > can > > > > choose to push or not to push to each type); network discovery does > > include > > > > that info, so you could use it to install clients for nt4. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no > > rights. > > > > "JOEY REGO" <JOEY REGO@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > > > > news:4307BCEC-7E6A-42DD-9A0D-B03BFC618B36@microsoft.com... > > > > > I work at a university and we have two domains. One for students and > > one > > > > for staff..I have installed SMS2003 on the Staff domain and most of the > > > > clients are getting installed and assigned. the clients that are in the > > > > student domain are getting assigned but not installed. i have made sure > > > > that the subnets of the student domain have been added as site > > > > boundaries..but the client is still not installing. does anyone know > > how i > > > > can get these clients on the student domain installed? > > > > > > > > > > Also since we are a university we are constantly reimaging computers > > and > > > > giving them differentnames. does sms delete computer accounts in its > > > > database that it cannot communicate with? is it dynamic like that? We > > have > > > > AD system discovery set up...do we have to make sure that ad is cleaned > > up > > > > regularly? or can i disable the ad system discovery and just use > > heartbeat > > > > and network. will this make a difference. THanks for your help in > > advance > > > > > > > > > > we have a one way trust and the student domain trusts the staff but > > the > > > > staff does not trust the domain. i don't know if that helps any. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
- Next message: sms1: "sms site hierarchy did not show up any site code"
- Previous message: Evan [MSFT]: "Re: Assigned = yes installed=no different subnets,site and domain"
- In reply to: JOEY REGO: "Re: Assigned = yes installed=no different subnets,site and domain"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
