Re: SMS 2003 and NAT firewall
From: Stan White [MS] (stanwh_at_microsoft.com)
Date: 03/19/04
- Next message: Jeff Harbaugh [MSFT]: "Re: Trouble with Advanced client install"
- Previous message: Mark Scott [MSFT]: "Re: Advanced Client not show"
- In reply to: Gaetan Simard: "SMS 2003 and NAT firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:29:41 -0800
To get the full function of the SMS client, you need the IP's to be 'real'
for all the clients and servers.
In other words, the IP assigned to the client by DHCP should be the one you
see in the resource record in SMS, and the one returned when you ping the
machine from the site server.
There are numerous issues with NAT including but not limited to site
assignment, roaming, remote control and push installation.
-- Stan [MSFT] -- -- This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. -- -- "Gaetan Simard" <gaetan.simard@eds.com> wrote in message news:qirj509eip67sbcequnc7pmcoho4f50pma@4ax.com... > The Operations Guide and Concept, Planning and Deployment Guide documents > are mute about SMS operations in a NAT > environment. The word NAT is mentionned only 2 times and it is under the > BITS area: > > <<< ... BITS can send and receive information by using a virtual private > network (VPN), with or > without a firewall that does not do network address translation (NAT). Use > of the Advanced > Client with NAT is not supported. ... >>> > > If I'm to assume that the last sentence means what it says, then I need to > setup a primary/secondary site behind a NAT > firewall to support my advanced clients. Am I right? > > How does the SMS site servers behaves in a NAT environment? > > The Microsoft Technet site is also quiet about SMS and NAT. > > Thanks. >
- Next message: Jeff Harbaugh [MSFT]: "Re: Trouble with Advanced client install"
- Previous message: Mark Scott [MSFT]: "Re: Advanced Client not show"
- In reply to: Gaetan Simard: "SMS 2003 and NAT firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|