Team or solo? (was Re: We need your feedback)
From: Cathy Moya [MS] (camoya_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 09/30/04
- Next message: Jon Yonke: "Error runnig SMS 2003 reporting tool"
- Previous message: Daniel Olsson: "Re: CAP is not syncronised with the Site server."
- In reply to: Scott Townsend: "Re: We need your feedback"
- Next in thread: Scott Townsend: "Re: Team or solo? (was Re: We need your feedback)"
- Reply: Scott Townsend: "Re: Team or solo? (was Re: We need your feedback)"
- Reply: Rory Niland: "RE: Team or solo? (was Re: We need your feedback)"
- Reply: Steve Schofield: "Re: Team or solo? (was Re: We need your feedback)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:28:19 -0700
That brings up an interesting tangent - how many of you have teams and how
many of you are out there on your own as SMS admins? Just curious . . .
-- Cathy Moya, MCSE: Security, MCT Technical Writer, Enterprise Management Content Group Check out the SMS Technical FAQ: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sms/sms2003/techfaq/default.mspx This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties and confers no rights. "Scott Townsend" <scott-i@.-N0-SPAMplease.enm.com> wrote in message news:u7bXhswpEHA.516@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > "<...snip...>hold on I'll pass it over to the patch management > team.<...snip...>" > > Team?? No wonder I cant figure it out. I'm just trying to do all of this > myself... > > I'll take a look at the document and see if it helps. > > Scott<- > > > "Rory Niland" <RoryNiland@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:23BC2884-6740-435D-A572-DA9882CF92AA@microsoft.com... > > Quote : "which is a long title for a very complicated subject" > > > > Feedback - why did MS make it so complicated?, then you wouldn't be > > worried > > about the books so much.. hold on I'll pass it over to the patch > > management > > team. > > > > > > "Cathy Moya [MS]" wrote: > > > >> X-posted to microsoft.public.sms.misc, > >> microsoft.public.sms.software_updates, microsoft.public.sms.swdist > >> followups set to microsoft.public.sms.misc > >> > >> This week we released a beta version of a new book in the Scenarios and > >> Procedures series of SMS documentation. The full title for this one is > >> "Scenarios and Procedures for SMS 2003: Software Distribution and Patch > >> Management", which is a long title for a very complicated subject. The > >> doc > >> is only available for download at this time. > >> > >> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=32f2bb4c-42f8-4b8d-844f-2553fd78049f&DisplayLang=en > >> > >> We are considering the document a "beta" because there is still some > >> content > >> missing and still some features that aren't complete. And there is always > >> room for improvement. As with any beta, we need beta testers. What we > >> need > >> to know is: > >> > >> 1) If you were (or are) new to SMS, could you take this document and > >> deploy > >> a package and/or a software update? > >> 2) What could we add to a document like this to make it more helpful to > >> someone who is new to SMS? > >> 3) What could we add to a document like this to make it more helpful to > >> you > >> personally, regardless if your experience level with SMS? > >> And anything else you'd like to add! > >> > >> When giving us feedback, we would like it sent to smsdocs@microsoft.com > >> and > >> with "Software Distribution and Patch Management" in the subject line so > >> we > >> can sort it out from the usual smsdoc emails. Thank you! > >> > >> I've put together a bit of a summary, for those who want to know some of > >> the > >> thought process behind it: > >> ------------------ > >> Target Audience: > >> ------------------ > >> This document is primarily intended for newer SMS administrators, though > >> if > >> you are an experienced SMS Administrator, you may find the planning > >> worksheets to be helpful if you do not have your own yet. If you are > >> experienced with SMS package deployment, we hope the document will be too > >> basic for you, but we hope you can give us feedback on topics you think > >> are > >> important but are not currently included. > >> > >> ----------- > >> Structure: > >> ----------- > >> Like the other S&P guides, we have tried to focus on the sequence you > >> need > >> to perform all the tasks - start at A, then go to B, then decide between > >> C > >> or D, and eventually get to Z. Like the S&P for Planning and Deployment, > >> there are several flow charts to guide you through the way and there are > >> planning worksheets to help you write down everything before you start > >> configuring. (Added bonus, you end up with hard copy doc of your > >> environment.) Also like the Planning and Deployment S&P, we tried to keep > >> the main part of the doc fairly short but include lots of appendices if > >> you > >> want more detail. > >> > >> Unlike the S&P for Planning and Deployment, I did the planning docs in > >> Word > >> format and annotated all of the lines. If you started by filling out > >> every > >> line of every form, you would approach the user interface knowing every > >> entry you need to make in every dialog box. And if you don't know what > >> option to choose, you can read the annotations to help you decide. Some > >> of > >> the planning forms, like boundary planning, use logic that moves you from > >> line to line like the US tax forms. > >> > >> ------------ > >> Content: > >> ----------- > >> The content is about 90% complete. Much of the content comes from > >> Chapters 5 > >> & 6 in the current SMS Operations Guide but there is also quite a bit of > >> new > >> content with the planning worksheets, and new material related to SP1 is > >> included. You can find the SP1 material by searching for *SP. > >> > >> Thanks for helping make our docs better! > >> > >> -- > >> Cathy Moya, MCSE: Security, MCT > >> Technical Writer, Enterprise Management Content Group > >> > >> Check out the SMS Technical FAQ: > >> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sms/sms2003/techfaq/default.mspx > >> This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties and confers no rights. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >
- Next message: Jon Yonke: "Error runnig SMS 2003 reporting tool"
- Previous message: Daniel Olsson: "Re: CAP is not syncronised with the Site server."
- In reply to: Scott Townsend: "Re: We need your feedback"
- Next in thread: Scott Townsend: "Re: Team or solo? (was Re: We need your feedback)"
- Reply: Scott Townsend: "Re: Team or solo? (was Re: We need your feedback)"
- Reply: Rory Niland: "RE: Team or solo? (was Re: We need your feedback)"
- Reply: Steve Schofield: "Re: Team or solo? (was Re: We need your feedback)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]