Re: SMS_DEF.MOF in sp1

• Previous message: Steve Hellmueller: "RE: NEW SMS NEWSGROUP FOR SOFTWARE UPDATES"
• In reply to: Louis: "Re: SMS_DEF.MOF in sp1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]

Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:30:46 -0700

You should at least disable the "SMS_ActiveSyncService" and
"SMS_ActiveSyncConnectedDevice" since these are for the device management
(beta) feature.
I seem to recall from a previous post that these classes will be created
once the feature pack is installed in the client machines, or at least have
run once. Have you done this already and still getting the failures?

-- 
Thanks,
Joseph Calabig
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Louis" <Louis@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message 
news:124E2D3A-0E06-4B17-8AF5-48E34C672C0F@microsoft.com...
> Joseph
>
> Thanks for your input, But I have already have the latest Software Updates
> feature Pack installed. This is why I have a problem. The thing I need to
> know is how to install the WMI classes and what the mechanisum to enable 
> them
> is.
>
> Louis
>
> "Joseph Calabig [MSFT]" wrote:
>
>> You are correct in saying that these classes do not have providers yet
>> (well, they have but they are inactive yet.)
>> You can disable the reporting for these classes by going through you
>> sms_def.mof and looking for the definitions for these classes.
>> Then, disabling them as below:
>>
>> [SMS_Report("True"),                     <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< change this 
>> to
>> SMS_REPORT(FALSE)
>> SMS_Group_Name("ActiveSync Service"),
>> SMS_Class_ID("MICROSOFT|ACTIVESYNC_SERVICE|1.0"),
>> Namespace ("root\\\\SmsDm") ]
>>
>> class SMS_ActiveSyncService : SMS_Class_Template
>> {
>>  [SMS_Report("True")]
>>  string LastSyncTime;
>>
>>  [SMS_Report("True"), key]
>>  uint32 MajorVersion;
>>
>>  [SMS_Report("True"), key]
>>  uint32 MinorVersion;
>> };
>>
>>
>> These classes are used by the Software Update and Device Management 
>> Feature
>> Packs.
>> This will give you more info on how to use them:
>> http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/sms/2003/all/cpdg/en-us/plan8pmb.mspx
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/smserver/downloads/2003/dmfpbeta.asp
>>
>> -- 
>> Thanks,
>> Joseph Calabig
>>
>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no 
>> rights.
>>
>> "Louis" <Louis@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:947EDA64-7088-4117-834F-448433144A06@microsoft.com...
>> > When you say not used by default, how would I enable these classes? I
>> > understand this will give better patching inventory and I would like to
>> > enable it, if possible.
>> >
>> > Or are you saying that these classes do not has providers yet?
>> >
>> > Louis
>> >
>> > "Joseph Calabig [MSFT]" wrote:
>> >
>> >> These classes are not used by default. Unless you intend to use it 
>> >> soon,
>> >> I
>> >> would just disable these classes in the sms_def.mof.
>> >> That will stop Inventory from reporting and getting errors.
>> >>
>> >> -- 
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Joseph Calabig
>> >>
>> >> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
>> >> rights.
>> >>
>> >> "Louis" <Louis@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:114638EC-E604-41C4-A87D-258B09267354@microsoft.com...
>> >> >I have installed SP1 and updated to the new scan tool. Now I get 
>> >> >errors
>> >> >in
>> >> > the InventoryAgent.log  I have run compmof sms_def.mof on the client
>> >> > and
>> >> > server
>> >> >
>> >> > Collection: Class "Win32_PatchState_Extended" does not exist out.
>> >> > Collection: Class "SMS_ActiveSyncService" does not exist out.
>> >> > Collection: Class "Win32_Vulnerability_Detail" does not exist
>> >> > out.Collection: Class "SMS_ActiveSyncConnectedDevice" does not exist
>> >> > out.Collection: Class "Win32_Vulnerability" does not exist out.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Why is this and how do I fix it?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Louis
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>> 

• Previous message: Steve Hellmueller: "RE: NEW SMS NEWSGROUP FOR SOFTWARE UPDATES"
• In reply to: Louis: "Re: SMS_DEF.MOF in sp1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]