Re: NLB MPs & SMS DB
- From: buddycwll@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 17 Feb 2006 01:03:24 -0800
Hi Steve. Thanks for you replies.
Comment in reference to my original questions:
1. I agree that IIS traffic would decrease but I wonder about the hit
on the SMS DB now that all that communication between it and the MP is
over the network. I guess I'm weighing up the reduction of IIS hits
against the increase of SQL hits and wondering if we could be improving
IIS performance but making SQL more sluggish?
2. I can only find a very small piece of information in Microsoft's
documentation that refers to the choices one can make with NLB MPs and
the SMS DB. It's about a paragraph. I can't help but wonder that there
must be more documentation somewhere? I can kind of understand the
choices it gives but it seems very abstract.
3. I was specifically looking to see if Distribution Points can be
NLB'd. Doesn't look like it me thinks.
In a way I'm surprised that we need to NLB our MPs given that a site
server is supposed to support 10,000 clients + whereas we have only got
6,000 at best although our site server is doing everything currently.
Of course, Microsoft are usually out on their estimations. I do feel
that NLB MPs is a good idea in that it spreads the load better and adds
more resilience.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: NLB MPs & SMS DB
- From: Steve Thompson
- Re: NLB MPs & SMS DB
- References:
- NLB MPs & SMS DB
- From: buddycwll
- Re: NLB MPs & SMS DB
- From: Steve Thompson
- NLB MPs & SMS DB
- Prev by Date: Re: SQL Error during SP2 install
- Next by Date: c# code example regarding GetCategories ( )
- Previous by thread: Re: NLB MPs & SMS DB
- Next by thread: Re: NLB MPs & SMS DB
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
