Re: Sms 2003 - Advance client

Hi

Thanks for the reply , but i dont know how to set the boundaries and
Operating systems are win2000 professional and windows xp ..

I like Microsoft Newsgroups, Which provides to help me.


"Torsten [MVP]" wrote:

> Hi Omar,
>
> you cannot specify _Sitecodes_ as a boundary, but AD-_Sitenames_
>
> Regards,
> Torsten
> Microsoft MVP - SMS
>
> "Omar van der Hoeven" <OmarvanderHoeven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> message news:D19A8C88-F2F9-4E33-B2F0-2D944657FE6F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Can you tell us how you have set up the boundaries? Did you enter all
> > IP-ranges / Sitecodes as boundaries?
> >
> > Are there errors mentioned in the client configuration manager?
> > What type of OS's do you use?
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Omar van der Hoeven
> >
> >
> > "Umapathyk" wrote:
> >
> > > we have installed sms 2003 server in our office and Advance client
> > > auotmatically with site code installed in 100 systems out of 300 systems
> ,
> > > remaining 300 systems advance client is not automatically installed ,
> if I
> > > try to install advance client manually also it is not replicated to sms
> 2003
> > > server ..
> > >
> > > Note - Cleary mentioned my question about our office sceneario
> > >
> > > I have some knowledge in sms 2003 , and this is the first time i
> installed
> > > sms 2003 in our organisation , we have three branches ,
> > >
> > > First Branch name where the server is located - Manapakkam and here iam
> > > having two networks in one network (192.168.11.1 and 192.168.12.1 )
> > >
> > > In 192.168.11.1 series out of 100 systems 50 system SMS 2003 server
> > > identifed and remaining systems sms2003 cannot able to install Advance
> client
> > > automatically and 192.168.12.1 in this series out of 50 systems 3
> systems
> > > are are able to identify by sms2003 server
> > >
> > > And we have another 2 remote branches in our office in this none of the
> > > systems cannot able to install advance client .
> > >
> > > Advice me how i can proceed further ,
>
>
>
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: 802.1x and Windows 2000
    ... Microsoft said they will implement 802.1x (client side) on ... >> I would like to know if the 802.1x protocols and the EAP ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.security)
  • Re: 802.1x and Windows 2000
    ... I know XP is the ideal one, but Microsoft was going to ... include 802.1x (client side) in other operating systems, ... Does someone know when we will have 802.1x in Win2K? ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.security)
  • Re: David Faber Report : Putting 2 and 2 together
    ... Without significant exception, all OEMs pre-install Windows on the vast majority of PCs that they sell, and they uniformly are of a mind that there exists no commercially viable alternative to which they could switch in response to a substantial and sustained price increase or its equivalent by Microsoft. ... The accuracy of this belief is highlighted by the fact that the other vendors of Intel-compatible PC operating systems do not view their own offerings as viable alternatives to Windows. ...
    (misc.invest.stocks)
  • Re: David Faber Report : Putting 2 and 2 together
    ... Intel- compatible PC operating systems is directly evidenced by the ... all OEMs pre-install Windows on ... Microsoft from raising prices or imposing other burdens on customers ... their own offerings as viable alternatives to Windows. ...
    (misc.invest.stocks)
  • Re: David Faber Report : Putting 2 and 2 together
    ... Intel- compatible PC operating systems is directly evidenced by the ... all OEMs pre-install Windows on ... Microsoft from raising prices or imposing other burdens on customers ... their own offerings as viable alternatives to Windows. ...
    (misc.invest.stocks)