Re: File Encryption
- From: "Milan Stojanovic" <piksi 'at server' EUnet dot YU not COM>
- Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 21:35:31 +0100
Thanks for the reply, I would try some of this, and option 2 seems really
interesting to me. Point is to show to authorities that nobody ever uses
EFS, even it has been enabled a year ago on more than 100 computers in our
domain.
Thanks again.
"Marin Marinov" <marin-online@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MPG.1dfa84c6fd48116598990f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <#wBsoi39FHA.140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Milan Stojanovic"
> <username piksi@host eunet dot not com but YU> says...
>>
>> Sorry for interrupting, but I think that it is a great idea to have
>> report
>> of all workstations with some encrypted file. Do I need to modify MOF and
>> use a script, or it can be made by default mof?
>>
>> thanks in advance...
> <snip>
> Hi Milan,
> I would argue that it's such a good idea and this goes back to my
> initial question - why would one need that ;) Technically speaking,
> there are ways you could potentially do it:
> - script that recurses through all files and folders and reports data
> either in WMI or dumps a NOIDMIF file
> - figuring out how to make software inventory report IsEncrypted for a
> file. Software inventory seems to store file inventory information in
> the FileSystemFile WMI class (http://tinyurl.com/bgvqy) under root\ccm
> \invagt. However, the XML file that it generates and passes on to the MP
> (http://tinyurl.com/dk8ko) doesn't seem to contain all the properties
> available in this class.
> - for folders only, making use of the Win32_Directory class and its
> Encrypted property
>
> Bare in mind though that most of these (probably except option 2) will
> likely result in a performance hit on the respective computers. And
> again - finding out which machines have encrypted files is arguably
> beneficial plus it's reactive, not proactive. As a best practice, if
> your organization hasn't deployed a "real" PKI, deployed and maintains
> certificates for the users for use with EFS, disable EFS on the clients.
> If people can encrypt files whenever they chose without this being an
> officially designed for and supported feature, this can cause you a lot
> of headaches...pardon, "administrative overhead" ;)
>
> HTH
> --
> Cheers,
> Marin Marinov
> MCT,MCSE,MCSE:Security,MCP+I
> -
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
>
> "True knowledge exists in knowing that you know nothing."
> Socrates
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: File Encryption
- From: Marin Marinov
- Re: File Encryption
- References:
- File Encryption
- From: Stevie
- Re: File Encryption
- From: Marin Marinov
- Re: File Encryption
- From: Cathy Moya [MS]
- Re: File Encryption
- From: Milan Stojanovic
- Re: File Encryption
- From: Marin Marinov
- File Encryption
- Prev by Date: Re: File Encryption
- Next by Date: "Accepted - No Further Status"?
- Previous by thread: Re: File Encryption
- Next by thread: Re: File Encryption
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|