Re: SMS 2.0 SP6 TAP Nominations - Due Friday, February 4
From: Kim Oppalfens (kim_at_computacenter.nospam)
Date: 02/02/05
- Next message: Roderick: "Re: SQL Enterprise Mgr and SMS SP1"
- Previous message: censor: "Re: Patch Management SMS Server 2003"
- In reply to: Luke Packard [MSFT]: "Re: SMS 2.0 SP6 TAP Nominations - Due Friday, February 4"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:18:58 +0100
I already had a feeling the newsgroups became even more active than they
already were a couple of months ago.
No reason to thank me for it, I am participating largely for my own
benefit, I still learn lots from these newsgroups.
Kim
In article <#aVCgRICFHA.2104@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl>,
lukep@online.microsoft.com says...
> Yep. We've setting some aggressive goals for lowering URMs (unanswered
> posts) and SMS product group participation is up.
>
> We'd be in far worse shape without you Kim. :) Thanks for all your help!
>
>
-- Kim Oppalfens Proud father of Lennart Oppalfens Since 05/11/2004 08.53 GMT+1
- Next message: Roderick: "Re: SQL Enterprise Mgr and SMS SP1"
- Previous message: censor: "Re: Patch Management SMS Server 2003"
- In reply to: Luke Packard [MSFT]: "Re: SMS 2.0 SP6 TAP Nominations - Due Friday, February 4"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|