RE: Remote Tools for Support
From: JP (JP_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 11/12/04
- Next message: Cathy Moya [MS]: "Re: sms 2003 patch management is brutal!"
- Previous message: JP: "RE: Remote Tools for Support"
- In reply to: JP: "RE: Remote Tools for Support"
- Next in thread: Cathy Moya [MS]: "Re: Remote Tools for Support"
- Reply: Cathy Moya [MS]: "Re: Remote Tools for Support"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 22:45:02 -0800
I just looked this up. XP SP2 supported concurrent local and remote sessions
in BETA. This was removed in the released version of SP2.
"JP" wrote:
> Yaba,
>
> In general I use Remote Assistance / Remote Desktop for XP systems and SMS
> Tools for Win2K systems. The reason is that performance is way better for
> remote assistance. SMS remote control is pretty poor performance wise. It
> always has been and MS has no plans to update this technology since XP and
> above now have remote desktop built into the OS. However, since Win2k pro
> does not have this option you are stuck with SMS Tools for that OS.
>
> SMS remote control is true remote control in that it is administrator
> initiated and when connected both the end user and the SMS admin see the same
> screen. Depending on how you configure remote tools, the end user may not
> need to grant approval prior to the connection being made.
>
> Remote Assistance works off terminal services built into XP. It is a little
> different from remote control and has a few options that need to be explained:
>
> Remote Assistance is end user initiated where a user generates a request for
> assistance and sends it to the remote administrator. I don't usually use
> this because it requires the end user to perform a series of actions prior to
> the helpdesk person being able to help them.
>
> Offer Remote Assistance is initiated by the administrator through the Help
> and Support in XP. Enter this URL in the Start/Run box to jump right to the
> page:
>
> hcp://CN=Microsoft%20Corporation,L=Redmond,S=Washington,C=US/Remote%20Assistance/Escalation/Unsolicited/unsolicitedrcui.htm
>
> You will be prompted for the remote computer name. When you attempt to
> connect the end user will always be prompted and must grant you access prior
> to you being able to control the remote system. This is a problem if they
> are away from their desk. NOTE: This has to be enabled on XP systems. I
> enable this feature via group policy.
>
> Remote Desktop kicks anyone using the computer off, logs you on and blanks
> out their console screen. However, it does not require the end user's
> permission to access the remote system. I use this when nobody is at the
> remote computer and I need to control it. NOTE: I think Remote Desktop
> changed in XP SP2 to allow someone to use the console and another person to
> use a remote session without impacting each other.
>
> I hope this helps.
>
> JP
>
> "yaba daba doo" wrote:
>
> > Is there a preffered option between remote assistance and sms remote tools?
> > What if there is an environment that has some w2k and some wxp clients. Can
> > we use both of them?
- Next message: Cathy Moya [MS]: "Re: sms 2003 patch management is brutal!"
- Previous message: JP: "RE: Remote Tools for Support"
- In reply to: JP: "RE: Remote Tools for Support"
- Next in thread: Cathy Moya [MS]: "Re: Remote Tools for Support"
- Reply: Cathy Moya [MS]: "Re: Remote Tools for Support"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|