Re: SMS 2003 collection membership based on membership of other co
From: Sourabh Guha \(MSFT\) (sguha_at_microsoft.com)
Date: 09/21/04
- Next message: Sourabh Guha \(MSFT\): "Re: SMS Client Problem"
- Previous message: Karl: "IP Address Query Help"
- In reply to: david_at_opticsenses.com: "Re: SMS 2003 collection membership based on membership of other co"
- Next in thread: Kim Oppalfens: "Re: SMS 2003 collection membership based on membership of other collections"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:44:09 -0700
David,
Could you please post your original question to the group?
Thanks.
-- Sourabh Guha (MSFT) Systems Management Server Group (MSFT) --This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. <david@opticsenses.com> wrote in message news:ch8er2$kf0@odah37.prod.google.com... > Torsten, > > The point of my question was that the criteria for collection "B" will > change constantly. It will be a query that I often update. I didn't > want to have to manually update collection "C" with a query to get the > rest of the machines each time I did this. Doing it this way is of > course possible - but then it is a case of creating two queries every > time rather than one, and I was interested in finding out if this can > be avoided. > > Unless you actually meant that the query of collection "C" can > literally point to the collection "B" query with the "not in" operator > so that it didn't need modifying each time I modified the collection > "B" query? > > Thanks, > David >
- Next message: Sourabh Guha \(MSFT\): "Re: SMS Client Problem"
- Previous message: Karl: "IP Address Query Help"
- In reply to: david_at_opticsenses.com: "Re: SMS 2003 collection membership based on membership of other co"
- Next in thread: Kim Oppalfens: "Re: SMS 2003 collection membership based on membership of other collections"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|