Re: Question!
From: David Randall [MS] (davidra_at_microsoft.com)
Date: 09/14/04
- Next message: Buckeye Steve: "Collection Members not same as push recipients."
- Previous message: Richard Threlkeld
: "Re: SMS 2003 with SUS" - In reply to: David Randall [MS]: "Re: Question!"
- Next in thread: ipsec23: "Re: Question!"
- Reply: ipsec23: "Re: Question!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 08:54:04 -0700
ipsec23 let me know offline that the pkg update fixed the problem.
--
--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"David Randall [MS]" <davidra@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:OoWJUjcmEHA.3336@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Just to make sure the client policy and the server policy and the package
> information are in sync,
>
> Right click your package and update it. This will bump the version number
> on the package. Then, wait for the other servers to get the new policy
> (every 60 minutes by default, unless you want to manually trigger a
> machine policy cycle) and see if they can get the package. The only thing
> that comes to mind is an out-of-sync policy with the package version.
>
> --
> --
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
> "ipsec23" <ipsec23@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:F305363C-DE0C-4DF1-AA5A-1CEDDF991E59@microsoft.com...
>> Hi David,
>> Thanks for the response. The site server and the servers are on different
>> subnets and have included both the subnets in the Site boundaries tab.In
>> the
>> "Roaming boundaries" tab have set the "include site boundaries within the
>> local roaming boundaries of this site" . I have not enabled my DP to be a
>> protected DP.
>>
>> Some servers of the same server subnet are able to receive content and
>> apply
>> patches which makes me wonder as to why only certain servers are acting
>> strange!!!?? Changed the adv properties to run the prg from a remote
>> ditribution point .Found that the cleint received the updated policy but
>> then
>> again it has started showing the same old error message "ContentAvailable
>> ignoring update with no DPs for content request ID
>> {42025D82-43BC-41EF-A8F2-FF55836C3609}".
>>
>> Many Thanks!!
>>
>>
>> "David Randall [MS]" wrote:
>>
>>> ContentAvailable ignoring update with no DPs for content request ID
>>>
>>> means that you don't have the package at the distribution point for the
>>> client.
>>>
>>> Check to make sure the DP has the package (in Package Status node)
>>> Make sure your client computer is in the roaming (or site) boundaries of
>>> the
>>> site you're intending to have it get DP's from.
>>> By default, the advertisement properties say "don't run" when the
>>> computer
>>> is a remote roaming boundary, try changing the advertisement properties
>>> to
>>> "run" and see if that helps.
>>> If you've got protected DP's, then the client is outside the boundaries
>>> of
>>> all your DP's.
>>>
>>> Let us know how it goes.
>>>
>>> Dave
>>> --
>>> --
>>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
>>> rights.
>>> "ipsec23" <ipsec23@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>> news:369EF276-0100-43B6-A3B8-4875ACC04DAB@microsoft.com...
>>> > Hi carl,
>>> > Thanks for the response.I havent had much luck with recompiling the
>>> > cimwin32.mof.Heres what i did.
>>> > Found that almost all of my 2000 servers was showing this error in
>>> > their
>>> > respectinve execmgr.log files. Fortunately found one machine that
>>> > could
>>> > downlaod content from the DP and deploy the patch. Copied the
>>> > cimwin32.mof
>>> > from this machine and copied it to the machine under examination.
>>> > Created
>>> > a
>>> > batch file "troubleshoot.bat" with the location of the .mof file which
>>> > looked
>>> > like this :
>>> > Mofcomp C:\Winnt\system32\wbem\cimwin32.mof
>>> > Executed the batch file and got the message Done!, which i believe
>>> > indiacted
>>> > that the compilation was successfull. Executed the "Run Advetised
>>> > Programs"
>>> > utility to find execmgr.log is generating the follwing messgae hour
>>> > after
>>> > hour!
>>> > ContentAvailable ignoring update with no DPs for content request ID
>>> > {42025D82-43BC-41EF-A8F2-FF55836C3609}
>>> > To stop this error messsage from getting generated tried recompiling
>>> > with
>>> > the old file again but it doesnt seem to fix the problem. I guess the
>>> > problem has worsened now.Please help!! How do i resolve this issue??
>>> > Many Thanks!!
>>> >
>>> > "ipsec23" wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >> I am running SMS 2003 on a Windows 2003. I am having a problem with
>>> >> my
>>> >> test
>>> >> cleint receiving a patch update from the site server. execmgr.log
>>> >> shows
>>> >> the
>>> >> following.
>>> >> Execmgr.log
>>> >> ========
>>> >> Policy is updated for Program: MBSA - 2000_Update, Package: CIT00012,
>>> >> Advert: CIT20021
>>> >> Content version for program MBSA - 2000_Update package CIT00012 has
>>> >> been
>>> >> changed to 3
>>> >> Cancel content request for program MBSA - 2000_Update package
>>> >> CIT00012 as
>>> >> content version has changed.
>>> >> Requesting content from CAS for package CIT00012 version 3
>>> >>
>>> >> Raising event:
>>> >> [SMS_CodePage(437), SMS_LocaleID(1033)]
>>> >> instance of SoftDistWaitingContentEvent
>>> >> {
>>> >> AdvertisementId = "CIT20021";
>>> >> ClientID = "GUID:6438FECA-0BB5-4D5C-B5BD-2A1F2B2AB111";
>>> >> DateTime = "20040910065455.421000+000";
>>> >> MachineName = "ACE";
>>> >> PackageName = "CIT00012";
>>> >> PackageVersion = "3";
>>> >> ProcessID = 1240;
>>> >> ProgramName = "MBSA - 2000_Update";
>>> >> SiteCode = "CIT";
>>> >> ThreadID = 1472;
>>> >> };
>>> >> Successfully raised SoftDistWaitingContentEvent event for program
>>> >> MBSA -
>>> >> 2000_Update
>>> >> Execution Request for program MBSA - 2000_Update state change from
>>> >> WaitingContent to WaitingContent
>>> >> ContentAvailable ignoring update with no DPs for content request ID
>>> >> {42025D82-43BC-41EF-A8F2-FF55836C3609}
>>> >>
>>> >> From the last line of the log snippet, looks like the client is
>>> >> unable to
>>> >> find DP's.But i find the "package distribution point" setting to show
>>> >> the
>>> >> right DP.The DP has recd the content. The client is able to access
>>> >> the
>>> >> mgmt
>>> >> point. I am wondering as to why it is not able to get the content
>>> >> from
>>> >> the DP?
>>> >> Can someone kindly help me out.
>>> >>
>>> >> Many Thanks!!
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
- Next message: Buckeye Steve: "Collection Members not same as push recipients."
- Previous message: Richard Threlkeld
: "Re: SMS 2003 with SUS" - In reply to: David Randall [MS]: "Re: Question!"
- Next in thread: ipsec23: "Re: Question!"
- Reply: ipsec23: "Re: Question!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
