Re: Question!
From: David Randall [MS] (davidra_at_microsoft.com)
Date: 09/13/04
- Next message: ptwilliams: "Re: SMS WMI Classes"
- Previous message: Buckeye Steve: "assigning a program"
- In reply to: ipsec23: "Re: Question!"
- Next in thread: David Randall [MS]: "Re: Question!"
- Reply: David Randall [MS]: "Re: Question!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:33:57 -0700
Just to make sure the client policy and the server policy and the package
information are in sync,
Right click your package and update it. This will bump the version number
on the package. Then, wait for the other servers to get the new policy
(every 60 minutes by default, unless you want to manually trigger a machine
policy cycle) and see if they can get the package. The only thing that
comes to mind is an out-of-sync policy with the package version.
--
--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"ipsec23" <ipsec23@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:F305363C-DE0C-4DF1-AA5A-1CEDDF991E59@microsoft.com...
> Hi David,
> Thanks for the response. The site server and the servers are on different
> subnets and have included both the subnets in the Site boundaries tab.In
> the
> "Roaming boundaries" tab have set the "include site boundaries within the
> local roaming boundaries of this site" . I have not enabled my DP to be a
> protected DP.
>
> Some servers of the same server subnet are able to receive content and
> apply
> patches which makes me wonder as to why only certain servers are acting
> strange!!!?? Changed the adv properties to run the prg from a remote
> ditribution point .Found that the cleint received the updated policy but
> then
> again it has started showing the same old error message "ContentAvailable
> ignoring update with no DPs for content request ID
> {42025D82-43BC-41EF-A8F2-FF55836C3609}".
>
> Many Thanks!!
>
>
> "David Randall [MS]" wrote:
>
>> ContentAvailable ignoring update with no DPs for content request ID
>>
>> means that you don't have the package at the distribution point for the
>> client.
>>
>> Check to make sure the DP has the package (in Package Status node)
>> Make sure your client computer is in the roaming (or site) boundaries of
>> the
>> site you're intending to have it get DP's from.
>> By default, the advertisement properties say "don't run" when the
>> computer
>> is a remote roaming boundary, try changing the advertisement properties
>> to
>> "run" and see if that helps.
>> If you've got protected DP's, then the client is outside the boundaries
>> of
>> all your DP's.
>>
>> Let us know how it goes.
>>
>> Dave
>> --
>> --
>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
>> rights.
>> "ipsec23" <ipsec23@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:369EF276-0100-43B6-A3B8-4875ACC04DAB@microsoft.com...
>> > Hi carl,
>> > Thanks for the response.I havent had much luck with recompiling the
>> > cimwin32.mof.Heres what i did.
>> > Found that almost all of my 2000 servers was showing this error in
>> > their
>> > respectinve execmgr.log files. Fortunately found one machine that could
>> > downlaod content from the DP and deploy the patch. Copied the
>> > cimwin32.mof
>> > from this machine and copied it to the machine under examination.
>> > Created
>> > a
>> > batch file "troubleshoot.bat" with the location of the .mof file which
>> > looked
>> > like this :
>> > Mofcomp C:\Winnt\system32\wbem\cimwin32.mof
>> > Executed the batch file and got the message Done!, which i believe
>> > indiacted
>> > that the compilation was successfull. Executed the "Run Advetised
>> > Programs"
>> > utility to find execmgr.log is generating the follwing messgae hour
>> > after
>> > hour!
>> > ContentAvailable ignoring update with no DPs for content request ID
>> > {42025D82-43BC-41EF-A8F2-FF55836C3609}
>> > To stop this error messsage from getting generated tried recompiling
>> > with
>> > the old file again but it doesnt seem to fix the problem. I guess the
>> > problem has worsened now.Please help!! How do i resolve this issue??
>> > Many Thanks!!
>> >
>> > "ipsec23" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >> I am running SMS 2003 on a Windows 2003. I am having a problem with my
>> >> test
>> >> cleint receiving a patch update from the site server. execmgr.log
>> >> shows
>> >> the
>> >> following.
>> >> Execmgr.log
>> >> ========
>> >> Policy is updated for Program: MBSA - 2000_Update, Package: CIT00012,
>> >> Advert: CIT20021
>> >> Content version for program MBSA - 2000_Update package CIT00012 has
>> >> been
>> >> changed to 3
>> >> Cancel content request for program MBSA - 2000_Update package CIT00012
>> >> as
>> >> content version has changed.
>> >> Requesting content from CAS for package CIT00012 version 3
>> >>
>> >> Raising event:
>> >> [SMS_CodePage(437), SMS_LocaleID(1033)]
>> >> instance of SoftDistWaitingContentEvent
>> >> {
>> >> AdvertisementId = "CIT20021";
>> >> ClientID = "GUID:6438FECA-0BB5-4D5C-B5BD-2A1F2B2AB111";
>> >> DateTime = "20040910065455.421000+000";
>> >> MachineName = "ACE";
>> >> PackageName = "CIT00012";
>> >> PackageVersion = "3";
>> >> ProcessID = 1240;
>> >> ProgramName = "MBSA - 2000_Update";
>> >> SiteCode = "CIT";
>> >> ThreadID = 1472;
>> >> };
>> >> Successfully raised SoftDistWaitingContentEvent event for program
>> >> MBSA -
>> >> 2000_Update
>> >> Execution Request for program MBSA - 2000_Update state change from
>> >> WaitingContent to WaitingContent
>> >> ContentAvailable ignoring update with no DPs for content request ID
>> >> {42025D82-43BC-41EF-A8F2-FF55836C3609}
>> >>
>> >> From the last line of the log snippet, looks like the client is unable
>> >> to
>> >> find DP's.But i find the "package distribution point" setting to show
>> >> the
>> >> right DP.The DP has recd the content. The client is able to access the
>> >> mgmt
>> >> point. I am wondering as to why it is not able to get the content from
>> >> the DP?
>> >> Can someone kindly help me out.
>> >>
>> >> Many Thanks!!
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
- Next message: ptwilliams: "Re: SMS WMI Classes"
- Previous message: Buckeye Steve: "assigning a program"
- In reply to: ipsec23: "Re: Question!"
- Next in thread: David Randall [MS]: "Re: Question!"
- Reply: David Randall [MS]: "Re: Question!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
