Re: SMS 2003 Deployment
From: Cathy Moya [MS] (camoya_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 07/29/04
- Next message: Jon Ellis (MSFT): "Re: Access to a custom table"
- Previous message: Cathy Moya [MS]: "Re: Office Scan Tool failing with MEssage Id 11405"
- In reply to: Srikanth: "SMS 2003 Deployment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:02:47 -0700
Yup, for the 95 support you'd have to have the 2.0 site.
Check out the Scenarios and Procedures for SMS 2003: Planning and
Deployment, availabe from the SMS docs page for more planning information.
http://www.microsoft.com/smserver/techinfo/productdoc/default.asp
-- Cathy Moya Technical Writer, Enterprise Management Content Group (SMS and MOM) This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties and confers no rights. "Srikanth" <Srikanth@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:55633144-DD87-40F1-9255-EA42FEE1BA8E@microsoft.com... > I need to deploy SMS 2003 for an environment that has WIN95, WIN98SE, WIN NT, WIN 2000, WIN XP. Shall I use a combination of SMS 2003 Central & Site Server to support WIN 98SE, WIN NT, WIN 2000 & XP along with SMS 2.0 Site Server to support WIN95. Would someone share some light on this approach. Thanks in advance.
- Next message: Jon Ellis (MSFT): "Re: Access to a custom table"
- Previous message: Cathy Moya [MS]: "Re: Office Scan Tool failing with MEssage Id 11405"
- In reply to: Srikanth: "SMS 2003 Deployment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
