Re: SMS Feature Pack
From: Richard Threlkeld
Date: 04/28/04
- Next message: Shannon: "NetMon"
- Previous message: Charles Clarke \(MVP\): "Re: deploying SMS clients to servers"
- In reply to: Fred: "Re: SMS Feature Pack"
- Next in thread: Fred: "Re: SMS Feature Pack"
- Reply: Fred: "Re: SMS Feature Pack"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 07:52:07 -0700
#1 - Doesn't matter at all, but I sugest installing SP5 first because of the
change to the SMSCliToknLocalAcct& account and how this effects the Sync
Advertisement.
#2 - We have a comprehensive guide comming out on www.myitforum.com in the
next couple of weeks so stay tuned to the newsletter, however David Baur
also did a really good one:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=11C17A4C-CD03-4F2F-
AC76-67DAE1DFE3E4&displaylang=en .
-- Richard Threlkeld Microsoft MVP - SMS Looking to get more involved in the SMS community? Join the SMS email discussion list today: http://lists.listleague.com/mailman/listinfo/mssms "Fred" <hush@dontspamme.com> wrote in message news:#ipcEKSLEHA.2400@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > Hi Richard, > > Thanks for the reply. I've been reading up on it and am fairly sure I'll go > ahead with it. I've looked through the White Paper Enterprise Software > Update Management using SMS 2.0 SUS and downloaded the files. I have 2 > questions. > > 1 Would it be better to install SMS SP5 before or after installing SUS? > 2 Are there any detailed instructions on how to install and operate the > Software update services functionality, outside of the .chm files included > in the download. A search of the MS Webpages related to the Feature Pack > doesn't seem to have anthing relevant > > Regards, > > John > "Richard Threlkeld <MVP>" <pleasenospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:uCh1BXGLEHA.2236@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > > A lot of SMS Administrators use it today and have found it helpful. I > think > > it Rocks! > > > > Yes, MBSA is the backend scanning engine used for patch determination. > SMS > > actually has many advantages over SUS such as reporting, targeting, etc. > > > > You can make your packages in about 15 minutes with the SUSFP, and spend > as > > much time as you want after testing. > > > > -- > > Richard Threlkeld > > Microsoft MVP - SMS > > > > Looking to get more involved in the SMS community? > > Join the SMS email discussion list today: > > http://lists.listleague.com/mailman/listinfo/mssms > > > > "Fred" <hush@dontspamme.com> wrote in message > > news:#qjgc0ELEHA.628@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > I have a question re the SMS2.0 Feature Pack. I'm investigating how to > > best > > > automate Security Patch management, and am looking at the Feature pack. > > > Does anyone use this? Is it any good? I understand that it integrates > with > > > MBSA to determine the requirement for patches on a given machine, is > this > > > correct? > > > Is there any advantage over using SUS instead of Feature Pack > > functionality? > > > > > > Currently I spend 2 days configuring and testing the patches as MS > release > > > them, then manually setting up the collections and queries to perform > > this. > > > Can anyone recommend a better solution? > > > > > > Many Thanks > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > > >
- Next message: Shannon: "NetMon"
- Previous message: Charles Clarke \(MVP\): "Re: deploying SMS clients to servers"
- In reply to: Fred: "Re: SMS Feature Pack"
- Next in thread: Fred: "Re: SMS Feature Pack"
- Reply: Fred: "Re: SMS Feature Pack"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]