Re: PDF transparency
- From: "Jan Kucera" <miloush@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:16:43 +0200
Hi Matt again, I was thinking about this a while, and I don't think you're right. Either PDF is absolutely transparency non-friendly, or there is nothing to handle. If I have transparent image and it has to be flattened, than the PDF is not transparenty friendly. If it hasn't to be flattened, why there are different results when displaying transparent images?
Jan
"Matt Beals" <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:C245CC68.60E78%matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Huh?? Adobe handles transparency better than anyone else. PDF is *very*
transparency friendly. It is the flattening of transparency where you run
into differences. Even then, Adobe is best at it.
Matt Beals
Consultant
Enfocus Certified Trainer
Markzware Recognized Trainer
(206) 201-2320 - Main
(720) 367-3869 - eFax
mailto:matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Come visit me at:
http://www.automatetheworkflow.com
http://www.mattbeals.com
http://blog.mattbeals.com
Friends don't let friends write HTML email
On 4/13/07 10:55 PM, in article
6D45B19A-7268-48E4-82BB-C482079AB3DE@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Jan Kucera"
<miloush@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi, is there any way to tell Publisher (2007) to render transparent graphics
to PDF better? I know PDF itself is not transparent-friendly, but if I use
Adobe products, there seems to be no such problems (black contures around
the images).
Thanks, Jan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PDF transparency
- From: Matt Beals
- Re: PDF transparency
- References:
- PDF transparency
- From: Jan Kucera
- Re: PDF transparency
- From: Matt Beals
- PDF transparency
- Prev by Date: Re: Banner printing
- Next by Date: Re: Version conversion!
- Previous by thread: Re: PDF transparency
- Next by thread: Re: PDF transparency
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|