Re: Pub 2002 vs. 2007

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

Dawnvk

Question #1:
2007 has a picture compression function built in

Question #2:
This is an unknown. Some 2002 publications open without a hitch and some seem to act oddly when it comes time to save them. Post your pub file and we can try and open it and test it with 2007. "www.vkvboers.com/pub/myfile.pub" would work

Question #3:
I have not seen a difference with the files produced by 2007 and 2002 index.htm etc

Question #4:
Without trying your specific code in 2007 it is an unknown. Can you post the code?

Question #5:
?

One person's findings. I am thinking that you will get more input and opinions on this one (hopefully)

Spike


"dawnvk" <dawnvk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:0DA78715-AAA1-431C-8744-893E992FA4B6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I've used 2002 for some time to create some fairly complex websites and I
really like it. I'm considering moving to 2007, but have a few questions
first. I can't remember the details, but somewhere along the way, I installed
a little filter/tool that somehow filters the photos and makes them smaller.
Since installing this "feature" when I export to webpage, I get a dialog box
that says: "Exporting your Web site as "Web Page, Filtered," produces smaller
HTML files that can be posted to and downloaded from the Internet more
quickly.... Do you want to continue with this export?" This is a really cool
tool. I have about 100 photos on my website, and I change them often. I sure
wouldn't want to have to open every file and reduce it for quicker loading
every time.

My first question is... does 2007 have something similar?

Second question: will my 2002 web open/convert seamlessly to 2007

Third: I know the files are broken out differently in 2007. Now I have
index.htm etc. and the photos look like: index_image001.jpg. Can someone tell
me where I can read up on the difference. I use filezilla to upload now fyi.

Fourth: Until I recently added some code to create drop-down menus (very
cool), it seemed to work/look fine in FF - now those menus aren't great in
FF, but work great in IE 6 and 7. What can I expect from 2007 in this regard.

Fifth: When I run my website through a code checker, I come up with about
100 errors, does 2007 create cleaner more happy code? Is there an update
somewhere for 2002 to create cleaner code?

Thanks to anyone who might have answers to any of these questions.

My website is www.vkvboers.com if anyone's interested in looking at what
I've done so far.

Dawnvk


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Internet Explorer 8 - for the brave
    ... type files. ... MS's inclusion of these files which, unknown to the user, log every website visited and, in the case of OE, log every e-mail sent, is shameful enough. ...
    (uk.people.silversurfers)
  • Re: Loading Coil Info Wanted
    ... In message, Reg Edwards writes ... This url is completely unknown to me. ... My website is quite popular amongst people other than radio amateurs. ... just a method of reducing what could otherwise be ...
    (uk.radio.amateur)
  • Re: Loading Coil Info Wanted (URL)
    ... >> When it comes to how the Internet works I am a novice. ... This url is completely unknown to ... >> My website is quite popular amongst people other than radio amateurs. ...
    (uk.radio.amateur)
  • Re: Did he ide?
    ... This last website says of Roman astronomical notions "These theories ... it's unknown to dictionary.com. ... writer wanted to avoid any hint of deliberate falsehood. ...
    (alt.usage.english)
  • Re: Dodgy Picture? [continued from ULM]
    ... The person who possesses the photo has probably bought it (if not with money, by swapping it for similar photos). ... The fact that such a video exists at all may upset me, but I would be upset at the person who took it, and distributed it, not the unknown number of unknown people who might have downloaded a secret copy. ... I'd want to download a copy for myself! ...
    (uk.legal)