Re: New problem with Firefox

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry

CWWJ,

There is a link to the Web Plus user forum on the Serif website. You might
post any question you have about the program there. Mike Koewler who helps
out here on occasion is a regular over there, and might be the one to answer
your questions.

It is my understanding that cross browser compatibility is not a problem
with Web Plus, centering is a built-in option, forms are easier, and you can
use the rounded corner text boxes you have in your Publisher web. Though it
is possible to import your Publisher html files into Web Plus, it probably
will not be a good idea, as you want to get away from all the Publisher
code. I would suggest rebuilding your site from scratch. As per the 96/120
dpi issue I don't know how WP code will deal with that, but I think that one
time when this subject came up before that Mike said that it wasn't a
problem. You might post that question on the WP forum, or you may just have
to test that out yourself. If you do switch and the 96/120 issue is
resolved, do us a favor and post back.

Good luck.

DavidF
"CWWJ" <CWWJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:EDE60F0A-A83C-4CFB-8DE9-DF69BC225F25@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks, David. Yeah, we do keep going in circles. I've talked to the
owner
of my company, and we will probably try WebPlus 10. I'm going to do a
little
investigating about cross-browser compatibility -- I do know WebPlus does
centering -- and if it checks out okay, what have I got to lose? $40. I
spend that much on a half a tank of gas. If you know anything more about
those aspects of WebPlus, I'd love to know. Thanks for your help, as
always.

"DavidF" wrote:

CWWJ,

I looked at your evaluation page:
http://www.burdin-adr.com/index_files/Page637.htm again, and it looks
fine
with this monitor set at 96 dpi in both IE6 and FF. And when I switch to
120
dpi it looks bad in FF.

I don't know what more to tell you. We have come full circle back to the
fact that if you produce your pages at 96 dpi, they are going to look
different at 120 dpi, and the other way around, especially in FF. No
matter
how many times we discuss it, you can't change the way that the Publisher
html coding engine works...you can only design around it. Sorry.

So my suggestion remains the same...try changing out the "Neutrality,
Empathy, Managing the...etc" text box that is converted to an image in
FF,
to see if that will make the page better. And make sure that the new
individual text boxes, with no fill, do not extend below the rounded
corner
object that contains your logo and the suggestion box. That object is
also
converted to an image in the FF code, and thus enlarged, and you do not
want
it to push the "Neutrality, Empathy, Managing the...etc" text boxes down,
out of line with the buttons.

DavidF

"CWWJ" <CWWJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:C4932820-B6AF-4460-9424-7535A5BC2BAE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
David, I did revise the evaluation page using text boxes. I'm going to
re-publish the site late tonight when nobody's watching just to see
what
happens. In my post to John G. I reported that I made Firefox my
default
browser for web preview -- the results were: Firefox web preview
looked
good
in both resolutions, much to my surprise. But when the site is
published
to
the web, it is another story -- it's a mess when viewed with mismatched
resolutions, i.e., 96dpi looking at 120dpi or vice versa. How can this
be?
How can a web preview on the Firefox browser look normal, but the web
site --
on the same browser -- is chaos?

As you will see if you visit the site (and I don't blame you if you're
tired
of doing this), you will note that it is now published at 96dpi. When
I
view
it at that resolution it works great. But if I view it at 120dpi,
several
things happen. Text in some, but not all, text boxes, becomes too
large
and
overflows the text box. In other text boxes it looks exactly as it did
at
the lower resolution. The boxes and buttons on the forms pages lose
alignment and end up well below the bottom of the page, totally out of
sync
with the rest of the page.

In the other version of this scenario -- published at 120dpi and viewed
at
96dpi, the opposite occurs: text is way too small for the text
boxes --
in
most pages -- and the forms go out of sync in the other direction, too
short
instead of too long.

"DavidF" wrote:

CWWJ,

One of the reasons I wanted the Evaluation page was that I think at
least
part of the problem has to do with your design, and I wanted to test
that
before suggesting a fix. But, if you go to
http://www.burdin-adr.com/index_files/Page637.htm and look at the form
where
you have "Neutrality, Empathy, Managing the...etc" that correspond
with
four
*option button* choices of Excellent to Poor. On the web page try to
left
click, drag select the text "neutrality...etc" and you will see that
regardless of which browser you cannot select the text because the
whole
text box has been converted to an image:
http://www.burdin-adr.com/index_files/image15541.jpg
As a general rule with Publisher webs, if whatever you are doing in
your
design results in the text being converted to an image, then you need
to
change your design. In this case it is at the minimum exaggerating the
96/120 dpi problem. Remember how I told you that when you Publish your
pages
at 120 dpi, then one of the results is the graphics and images on the
page
are "enlarged" in FireFox. The fact that your list of "Neutrality,
Empathy,
etc..." has been converted to an image, and is enlarged and as a
result
doesn't stay in line with your button choices.

So, try this. Instead of using a separate text box with different
shading
for your "Neutrality, Empathy, Managing the...etc" text lists, build
the
form as per the more normal way. Drag that text box that you are
currently
using off into your scratch area. Go to Insert > Form Control > Text
box.
Put "Neutrality" in that text box and align it horizontally with the
four
*option button* choices of "Excellent, good, fair, poor". Then again
go
to
Insert > Form Control > Text box for "Empathy". Create a new text box
for
each. Then republish the page and test it in FF and see how it looks.
I
betcha it will line up better.

I want to keep the focus on this particular page for now, with the
suggested
redesign, rather than stray off onto discussing other pages, and
different
browsers and such. But here is a different, and probably a better
description and discussion of 96/120 issue than I have provided
before:
Adjusting Scale for Higher DPI Screens:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms537625(VS.85).aspx
And remember that Publisher produces different code for non-IE
browsers
which means that FireFox deals with this scaling issue in a different
way
than IE does. So as I said above, fix the text that has been converted
to
an
image on your Evaluation page, and republish, and test the page in FF
to
see
how much that helps, before we start discussing other pages....

DavidF



"CWWJ" <CWWJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:EAC0D520-DFCE-4076-B453-436B6DB5E3E6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yeah, David, I will be happy to do that. I have used yousendit
several
times
to send large files. I will not get around to it til later today or
tonight
however. Thanks so much for your concern about this issue. The sad
thing
for me is that Publisher is so easy to use and creates a
good-looking
if
somewhat limited web site. But these underlying problems: the huge
padding
at higher resolutions -- on widescreen monitors it looks
ridiculous --
and
the inability to easily center plus the forms problem, are really
serious
issues. Do you know anything about the new FireFox 3.0? What
little
I've
read indicates they have made changes to solve some cross-browser
problems.
I think it is being released next week.

Incidentally, I was kidding about the class action lawsuit -- I am
certain
that all the warranty disclaimers are included in those terms of
agreement
that no one ever reads -- but failure to warn in a more visible way
than
in
the birdseed bold print of a warranty might be viewed as negligence
by
some
sharp lawyer.

"DavidF" wrote:

Wanked, winked, weird, whatever...we are getting confused with
semantics
here I believe. The layout of the page and the form may be messed
up
and
jumbled, but the form is still functional/usable...if you can
figure
out
which buttons, boxes and form controls go together. This 96/120 dpi
issue
affects the *layout* of the page, not the *functionality* of the
form.

Would you do me a favor? Make a copy of your Publisher file and
delete
all
the pages except for Evaluation form page at:
http://www.burdin-adr.com/index_files/Page637.htm . Then use
www.yousendit.com to upload the file, and email the link to that
file
to
yourself, and then post that link here so I can download your Pub
file. I
want to do some testing and see if possibly I can escalate this
with
MSFT.
This page is a great example of why they need to address this
96/120
dpi
issue. When you use yousendit.com you DO NOT have to sign up to use
the
services, and I use it all the time to send links to large files
for
downloading, rather than attach them to an email.

DavidF

"CWWJ" <CWWJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:CEEA1E21-88C2-4E73-ADDA-BD49468C8A2F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I'm not sure what you mean by "layout wanked." That can be
understood
as
a
good thing or a not-so-good thing, depending upon your point of
view.
If
this is a negative comment, then let me simply repeat what my
experience
has
been viewing my web site on several different computers, some
with
IE6
and
FF2, some with IE7 and FF2.

The only failure I experienced was with FireFox 2 when accessed
with
my
display set at 96dpi. The forms pages are jumbled (although
usable)
and
other pages have cosmetic problems like text too small in a big
text
box.
However, FF2 worked perfectly when I was set at 120dpi

Both versions of IE -- IE6 and IE7 -- displayed entirely
correctly
in
both
120dpi and 96dpi. The forms worked properly, all buttons and
boxes
were
in
the proper place, and all pages looked and functioned properly.
Just
last
night (as I reported) I used both IE7 and IE6 at 96dpi on two
computers
at
another location, and both worked perfectly.

As for what other web sites look like, I visit probably fifty or
sixty
a
day
and I sometimes can detect a site that may have been created in
Publisher.
If the content of the page is over to the left with lots of white
space
on
the right, it could be a Publisher site because Pub can't do
centering.
I
am
much more likely to see weird jumbled things when I am using
FireFox
than
with IE, so I suspect there are other web authoring tools that
have
the
same
limitations as Publisher in terms of cross-browser compatibility.
I
haven't
spent a lot of time switching back and forth between 96 and 120,
but
then
I
don't visit lots of sites with forms pages either.

Finally, just to sum up: I have had only one problem: viewing
my
web
site
at 96dpi on FireFox2. When I view it on FireFox2 at 120dpi, I
have
no
problem. I have had no problem with either IE6 or IE7 at either
96dpi
or
120dpi.

"Rob Giordano (Crash)" wrote:

Ok let's review:

IE7
@ 96 dpi - layout wanked
@ 120 dpi - layout wanked
FF2
@ 96 dpi - layout wanked
@ 120 dpi - layout wanked

think about this...view any website other than yours (try
Google,
MS,
CNN...whatever) with your monitor setting at 96 dpi, then change
it
to
120
dpi...does it wank out the layout?

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rob Giordano
Microsoft MVP Expression






"CWWJ" <CWWJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:CF21E805-63E3-4E5C-AC23-155FB7F33D2E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
John:
I am writing this from the crisis center where I work as a
volunteer
on
a
brand new Dell at 96dpi with a widescreen monitor and both
FireFox
and
IE7.
Our website works perfectly on IE7. Remember that the site
was
created
with


.

Quantcast