Re: New problem with Firefox

Tech-Archive recommends: Speed Up your PC by fixing your registry

I have 4 machines running here, and the layout looks ok on 2 but not the
others, depending on monitor, dpi setting etc.

I believe the problem comes from Pub's use of layers and absolute
positioning etc., but since Pub's html is kinda crazy it's hard to tell
exactly.

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rob Giordano
Microsoft MVP Expression






"CWWJ" <CWWJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:100A315A-62FB-457C-8F1D-00D7EAF959F3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
How do you explain that you see "jumbled" on both settings on both
FireFox2
and IE7 and I see "jumbled' only on Firefox2 at 96dpi? How do you explain
that John G. sees "jumbled" on his IE7 but does not on his wife's IE7? I
have tested this site now on six different machines running IE7 at 96dpi
and
all six work perfectly. On these same six machines FireFox2 worked
perfectly
at 120dpi but not at 96dpi. Three of these machines are brand new Dells
with
widescreen monitors, one was a one year old HP laptop, one was a three
year
old Gateway and one was a five year old custom-built. Switched back and
forth between 120 and 96 repeatedly and got the same result. Also ran
multiple times at both resolutions on IE6 with the same perfect results.
Finally, I am running IE7 right now and just left my web site a minute ago
and everything was perfect (in fact, it looks better on IE7 than it has
ever
looked).

Only FireFox2 at 96dpi failed. I don't get it. Does anyone have an
explanation? Showing me a picture of what you saw confirms you saw it,
but
it doesn't tell me why your IE7 doesn't work and mine does. Is the ghost
in
your machine or mine?


"Rob Giordano (Crash)" wrote:

2nd review:

the layout is jumbled in BOTH FF2 AND IE7 at both dpi settings of 96 dpi
and
120 dpi

http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d17/elrobo/burdinweb-FF2-96dpi.jpg
http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d17/elrobo/burdinweb-ie7-96dpi.jpg

I didn't have time to do them in 120 dpi but they are pretty much the
same
as the above.

FF2 is standards compliant you should design for it first, then
IE7...hopefully MS will get it right in IE8.



--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rob Giordano
Microsoft MVP Expression






"CWWJ" <CWWJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:CEEA1E21-88C2-4E73-ADDA-BD49468C8A2F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I'm not sure what you mean by "layout wanked." That can be understood
as
a
good thing or a not-so-good thing, depending upon your point of view.
If
this is a negative comment, then let me simply repeat what my
experience
has
been viewing my web site on several different computers, some with IE6
and
FF2, some with IE7 and FF2.

The only failure I experienced was with FireFox 2 when accessed with my
display set at 96dpi. The forms pages are jumbled (although usable)
and
other pages have cosmetic problems like text too small in a big text
box.
However, FF2 worked perfectly when I was set at 120dpi

Both versions of IE -- IE6 and IE7 -- displayed entirely correctly in
both
120dpi and 96dpi. The forms worked properly, all buttons and boxes
were
in
the proper place, and all pages looked and functioned properly. Just
last
night (as I reported) I used both IE7 and IE6 at 96dpi on two computers
at
another location, and both worked perfectly.

As for what other web sites look like, I visit probably fifty or sixty
a
day
and I sometimes can detect a site that may have been created in
Publisher.
If the content of the page is over to the left with lots of white space
on
the right, it could be a Publisher site because Pub can't do centering.
I
am
much more likely to see weird jumbled things when I am using FireFox
than
with IE, so I suspect there are other web authoring tools that have the
same
limitations as Publisher in terms of cross-browser compatibility. I
haven't
spent a lot of time switching back and forth between 96 and 120, but
then
I
don't visit lots of sites with forms pages either.

Finally, just to sum up: I have had only one problem: viewing my web
site
at 96dpi on FireFox2. When I view it on FireFox2 at 120dpi, I have no
problem. I have had no problem with either IE6 or IE7 at either 96dpi
or
120dpi.

"Rob Giordano (Crash)" wrote:

Ok let's review:

IE7
@ 96 dpi - layout wanked
@ 120 dpi - layout wanked
FF2
@ 96 dpi - layout wanked
@ 120 dpi - layout wanked

think about this...view any website other than yours (try Google, MS,
CNN...whatever) with your monitor setting at 96 dpi, then change it to
120
dpi...does it wank out the layout?

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rob Giordano
Microsoft MVP Expression






"CWWJ" <CWWJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:CF21E805-63E3-4E5C-AC23-155FB7F33D2E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
John:
I am writing this from the crisis center where I work as a volunteer
on
a
brand new Dell at 96dpi with a widescreen monitor and both FireFox
and
IE7.
Our website works perfectly on IE7. Remember that the site was
created
with
a setting of 120dpi, so if there was going to be a problem I would
see
it
here. The forms are jumbled on FireFox as they have been all along
when
accessing our site on a 96dpi setting, but they are perfect on IE7,
and
so
is
everything else (except the left registration is even more
pronounced
with
a
widescreen). So I am still baffled as to why you are having an IE7
problem
at either resolution. Maybe it has something to do with the fact
that
toilets flush in reverse in Australia?

"John G" wrote:

Well I just looked again (9:00AM Australian eastern time Friday)
and
the evaluation form still has the buttons all in the wrong places
wiith
IE7
and FF2
and the Submit and Revise buttons are still over the line starting
"Would
you like to reveal"
(I did refresh and try on 2 machines at 1024 X 768 and 96dpi)

How did you set your screen resolution to 1024 X FOUR68 or was
that a
typo??

--
John G.
Wots your REAL problem?
"CWWJ" <CWWJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:A4E6D513-7671-452C-B59B-96A14B70F2A0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
David and John G.

One final thing. I downloaded IE7 this morning and accessed our
web
site.
Used the forms with no problem whatsoever, so I don't understand
John's
insistence that they "fail" with both FireFox and IE7. However,
I
note
a
peculiarity in IE7 -- when viewing a web site (this one we're on
right
now,
for example), only the top half of the page is visible; the
bottom
half
is
just white space. You have to scroll down to see the rest of the
page.
This
is disconcerting at best. Anybody have the same experience? I
am
at
96dpi
and with a screen resolution of 1024x468. What gives?

"DavidF" wrote:

Hiya,

I agree with your computer guys. I don't like my workaround
anymore
than
telling people that they have to use IE in order to view a page
properly,
which you see on some web sites. I also think the issue of
centering
your
pages or laying your pages out so that they simulate centering
is
not
really
that important, if your forms pages are still jumbled for some
users
in
some
browsers.

This key issue is how the Publisher html coding engine fails to
produce
code
that works equally well whether it is produced or viewed on a
screen
or
monitor set at either 96 dpi or 120 dpi. Until now most people
have
been
able to live with the pages produced at 96 dpi, as most screens
and
monitors
came at that setting, but that is increasingly not the case
these
days.
Also
I have no reason to doubt John G when he says that IE7 also now
chokes
on
the different dpi settings...IE6 rendered both fairly well. And
also
until
now the people that have had this problem were not using forms
on
their
pages, and so if the pages looked a bit different in FF, that
was
also
something people could live with. But now given all these
things, I
think
you have reached a place where you should consider moving away
from
Publisher.

You are also using HTTP uploading protocol which is dependent
upon
FPSE.
MSFT has made that process difficult in IE7 and especially with
Vista,
and
they have stopped supporting FPSE. This means that eventually
your
host
will
probably discontinue their support of FPSE...many already have.
Your
forms
are dependent upon FPSE.

Bottom line is that MSFT has to update Publisher to deal with
evolving
technology or people such as yourself will have to move on to
something
else. As Rob said, Web Expression which replaced FrontPage is
your
choice
if
you want to stay with MSFT. They just released version 2, and by
most
accounts it is a great program. It just will present a big
learning
curve
for you, and you will have to rebuild your site mostly from
scratch.
Alternatively, I would suggest that you consider Serif Web Plus.
It
will
be
less expensive and it gives you much the same ease of use as
Publisher...perhaps easier. To my knowledge it will do
everything
that
Publisher fails to do in your case...and rebuilding your site in
it
shouldn't take that long.

I am sure this isn't what you want to hear, but given your
circumstances,
I
think it is time for you to abandon Publisher. Sorry, but it is
failing
you
on too many levels.

DavidF

"CWWJ" <CWWJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:E4D556C9-26E0-4E9E-8D29-0E38AB219653@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I am still using IE6, but I will download IE7 tonight and see
if I
find
the
same problem John G. says he noticed. Gulp. I think having
two
versions,
one at 96 and the other at 120 makes sense. But some of my
computer
guys
say
I should never ask a client to "do something else" -- it makes
it
appear
we
didn't know what we were doing in the first place. (Of course
we
didn't).
But that certainly is an option. The "centering code" option
would
be
difficult, since we have a 28 page site that is updated fairly
often.
Did
I
understand you to say that each iteration would involve
redoing
all
pages,
not just the ones being updated?

I do understand what the different screen resolutions -- 1024
x
768
to
800x600 -- might do to an attempt to fake "centering" by
simply
moving
the
left margin of the page over and building the page over a
background
color,
texture, picture or design (even a custom design). But I have
done
a
couple
of sample pages this way and have viewed them at 800x600, and
although
the
page does move to the right, at that screen size it still
looks


.

Quantcast