Re: Image size publisher 2003
- From: "DavidF" <Nope@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:18:34 -0700
Ha...If the truth be told, I still use Pub 2000 for everything except
testing purposes and helping out here. It does everything I want to do, and
I prefer it to Pub2003 for web building especially. I know, Pub 2003 is
"better" for print publications, but I have found no need to switch...guess
I am one of those, if it ain't broke, why fix it, people.
I have Irfanview installed, but rarely use it. I use PS Elements for most
things and probably a half dozen other apps for one or two functions. For
example I like the "warmify" quick fix in Picasa from Google, and haven't
been able to duplicate it in Elements. It seems like every time I buy a new
piece of equipment, I get a new photo editor or organizer, and have just
quit installing them, especially after loading a couple that took over the
defaults...
DavidF
"Rob Giordano (Crash)" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23uhWZ9Y3GHA.4796@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I try to help when I can. Longtime user of p2000 and now also have 2003 (a
tad on the noobish side still with 03).
I use IrFanview for quick resize, rename, optimization but PS to actually
edit an image. I find IrFanview much quicker on batch ops.
"DavidF" <Nope@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eAAag3Y3GHA.3492@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|I do too. I didn't mean to confuse people. In an ideal world, they should
| resize and optimize the images in a third party image editing program
before
| they insert them into a Publisher 2003 webpage, and also use the
compression
| feature in Publisher. I suggest that because I suspect that most people
do
| not fully optimize the images for Publisher, and that there are probably
| other graphics on the pages that will benefit from the compression.
Using
| both, you get the fastest loading pages.
|
| FWIW I use Pub 2000 and import my images rather than insert them. I find
I
| get better results that way, but that is probably beyond what most
people
| want to do when they choose to use Publisher to produce their sites.
|
| Thanks for your comments...they are always helpful.
|
| DavidF
|
| "Rob Giordano (Crash)" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message
| news:e%23al0XY3GHA.1288@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >I like doing it outside of FP or Pub.
| >
| >
| > "DavidF" <Nope@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:u1uPNQY3GHA.3428@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | And after that, compress all the images and graphics: "Compress
graphics
| > | file sizes to create smaller Publisher Web pages":
| > | http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/assistance/HA011266301033.aspx
| > |
| > | DavidF
| > |
| > | "Rob Giordano (Crash)" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
| > message
| > | news:uoUfnIY3GHA.600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | > You should resize & optimize first.
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > "john" <jr_wilkinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > | > news:wQoQg.34812$E67.23901@xxxxxxxxxxx
| > | > | In publisher some image sizes are 5 megs
| > | > |
| > | > | When I publish to web can publisher reduce image size or do I
have
| > to
| > do
| > | > it
| > | > | manually?
| > | > | I published and site took forever to load
| > | > |
| > | > |
| > | > | John
| > | > |
| > | > |
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
|
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Image size publisher 2003
- From: Rob Giordano \(Crash\)
- Re: Image size publisher 2003
- From: john
- Re: Image size publisher 2003
- References:
- Image size publisher 2003
- From: john
- Re: Image size publisher 2003
- From: Rob Giordano \(Crash\)
- Re: Image size publisher 2003
- From: DavidF
- Re: Image size publisher 2003
- From: Rob Giordano \(Crash\)
- Re: Image size publisher 2003
- From: DavidF
- Re: Image size publisher 2003
- From: Rob Giordano \(Crash\)
- Image size publisher 2003
- Prev by Date: Re: Link to pdf file
- Next by Date: Re: Link to pdf file
- Previous by thread: Re: Image size publisher 2003
- Next by thread: Re: Image size publisher 2003
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|