Re: File Size in 2000 & 2003

Tech-Archive recommends: Speed Up your PC by fixing your registry

From: David Bartosik - MS MVP (dbartosik_at_mvps.org)
Date: 03/25/04 

Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 22:11:09 -0600

Dave you and I are on the same page. 

-- 
David Bartosik - MS MVP
for Publisher help:
www.davidbartosik.com
enter to win Pub 2003:
www.davidbartosik.com/giveaway.aspx
"DavidF" <Nope@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:OsHJMqhEEHA.3408@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Wayne, though you say you are the one confused, its my turn. I just reread
> this thread and I thought you were talking about the difference between
2003
> and 2000, but now you are quoting the size of 2002 files??? Perhaps you
> meant 2000?
>
> David B. can correct me, but since I started this, something seems to be
> wrong with your Pub files, because Pub 2000 html files are smaller than
2003
> html files...the code alone makes a big difference. I am no expert, but
> perhaps something went wrong in doing your Save As to convert your Pub
2003
> file to 2000. Perhaps you could try copy and paste from the Pub 2003 file
to
> another instance of Pub 2000 instead of a Save As conversion...once again,
> maybe David B. can shed some light on why your Pub 2000 is generating a
> larger html, but it sure isn't supposed to. If you need more convincing,
> then produce a new , one page website from one of the common templates in
> both versions, produce the html files and THEN compare sizes.
>
> Oh...and have you considered reducing the size of your images? How big are
> your images? I use a lot of 400 pixels wide jpg images that average 25 kb
in
> size. How many pages is your site? I produce a 75 to 100 page site with
> Publisher 2000, and no one page exceeds 100 kb, except for the pages that
> are loaded with images.Just some things to think about...DavidF

Relevant Pages

  • Re: File Size in 2000 & 2003
    ... I just reread ... David B. can correct me, but since I started this, something seems to be ... produce the html files and THEN compare sizes. ... Oh...and have you considered reducing the size of your images? ...
    (microsoft.public.publisher.webdesign)
  • Re: Canon 10D to 30D
    ... David J. Littleboy wrote: ... There are several things that attract me to it beyond the modest resolution ... The faster processor also means that review of images is very VERY fast. ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: Easy newbie Canon Rebel XT 1st questions
    ... Today David J Taylor commented courteously on the subject at ... >>> Just to set the record straight. ... >>> images, I tried to help him by suggesting the binary ... I really don't care about the original noise ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)
  • Re: ISO 200000 ?
    ... night-vision work some years ago, and the devices Kennedy is describing do ... It isn't bettered, David, it is just that the useful photon limit is well below the level that Roger is suggesting. ... Useful images can be produced when less than one photon per pixel per frame is collected. ... Kennedy mentioned taking a single frame of 1/50s exposure under overcast starlight conditions. ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: Animated Gif doesnt work
    ... David Bartosik - MS MVP ... "Steve McCarthy" wrote in message ... > option to "Ignore Master Page" is still greyed out. ... >>for Publisher help: ...
    (microsoft.public.publisher.webdesign)