Re: Multiple resource units erroneously affect duration?
- From: "Mike Glen" <glenATmvps.org>
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 22:22:03 -0000
You're welcome, Dave :-)
Mike Glen
MS Project MVP
See http://tinyurl.com/2xbhc for Project Tutorials
dave sprinkle wrote:
Thanks for the reply, Mike. I understand the issue now. Project
assumes that each of my 2 resources will complete 50% of the total
work. The project's duration then becomes the length of time
required by the slowest (lowest utilized) resource to complete
his/her 50%. Awkward.
Thanks again.
"Mike Glen" wrote:
Hi Dave,
Welcome to this Microsoft Project newsgroup :)
I think you'll get answers in my series on Microsoft Project in the
TechTrax ezine, particularly #10 on multiple resource assignments,
at this site: http://tinyurl.com/2xbhc or this:
http://pubs.logicalexpressions.com/Pub0009/LPMFrame.asp?CMD=ArticleSearch&AUTH=23
(Perhaps you'd care to rate the article before leaving the site, :)
Thanks.)
FAQs, companion products and other useful Project information can be
seen at this web address: <http://www.mvps.org/project/>
Hope this helps - please let us know how you get on :)
Mike Glen
MS Project MVP
dave sprinkle wrote:
I'm new to Project, so I'll concede this may be user error; however,
it appears that Project 2003 is incorrectly calculating task
duration when I change the units of one of my resources. An
example: 1 -- Make a new task. Type is 'Fixed Work'. Assign
'resource 1' with 100% utilization. Assign duration 100 hours.
2 -- Add 'resource 2' with 100% utilization. As you might expect,
Project recalculates duration to be 50 hours.
3 -- Reduce 'resource 2' utilization to 50%. In this case, Project
calculates duration to be 100 hours. Why? Our resource total is
now 150% of our nominal starting point, and yet Project is
calculating 100% of our nominal duration.
4 -- It gets worse. Reduce 'resource 2' utilization to 1%. In this
case, Project reports duration to be 5000 hours.
It seems Project is using the lowest utilization of the two
resources and applying that utilization to the entire effort.
Where is the bug -- in Project's calculation or in my understanding
of Project's algorithm?
Thanks in advance for your assistance.
.
- References:
- Multiple resource units erroneously affect duration?
- From: dave sprinkle
- Re: Multiple resource units erroneously affect duration?
- From: Mike Glen
- Multiple resource units erroneously affect duration?
- Prev by Date: Re: Setting fixed task start and end date
- Next by Date: Re: Graphical Indicator Colours
- Previous by thread: Re: Multiple resource units erroneously affect duration?
- Next by thread: Re: Setting fixed task start and end date
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|