Re: Dependencies and out of sequence scenario.

In article <BA848446-F0D3-4B61-BA8C-69F05A003EFF@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Manis <Manis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Sorry guys, that was a typo. All the dependencies are Finish to Start. That's
what I meant to say. (I am little bit confused by the earlier answers.)
My concern with this scenario is just one.
Eg:
Task1 - 1 day - 11/01 to 11/01
Task2 - 1 day - 11/02 to 11/02
Task3 - 1 day - 11/03 to 11/03.

They are in the correct sequence and that's their dependency.
If Task2 is complete on let's say, 10/25 and I mark it as complete. In what
situation would Task3 start on 11/02? Because now there's nothing happening
on 11/02.
For simplicity sake, let's assume just 3 tasks and 1 resource.
Would the Task3 dates change to 11/02? In my experiments, it didn't do that
automatically. If this does not happen, how can I make this happen? (not that
I would want to. just curious).

Thanks,
Manis.

Manis,
Yeah, I wondered if it was a typo but I think both Mike and I took you
literally.

OK, about your scenario. If task 2 is completed early, task 3 will still
show as starting on 11/3 (not 11/2) if one of two things are true -
either calculation is set to manual (Tools/Options/Calculation tab), or
there is a start-no-earlier-than constraint on task 3. This constraint
will automatically be set by Project if you manually entered task start
dates.

One more comment. You may or may not want task 3 to automatically move
back to 10/26 as a start date. It depends on how valid your links were
in the first place. Clearly the link between task 1 and 2 was not
necessary since task 2 finished ahead of task 1. However, it may still
be true that task 3 cannot start until task 1 is complete. In that case,
the link should be changed accordingly.

John
Project MVP

"Mike Glen" wrote:

Hi Manis,

Welcome to this Microsoft Project newsgroup :)

There should be no direct relationship between resources and dependencies.
The logic should be set irrespective of the resource requirements. Logic
dictates that you have to have the walls built before you put on the roof.
This is a Finish (of the walls)-to-Start (starting the roof) relationship
and is generally the norm for most projects. This is the way you should
build your project. If you are unsure of this, have a read of my Guide to
Network Analysis in Article 1 referenced below. When you have defined the
logic to your satisfaction, you can then begin to assign resources. Then
you can let Project sort out overallocations by levelling. Thus, I would
begin by changing all the precedence links to be Finish-to-Start.

You might like to have a look at my series on Microsoft Project in the
TechTrax ezine, particularly #1, at this site: http://tinyurl.com/2xbhc or
this:
http://pubs.logicalexpressions.com/Pub0009/LPMFrame.asp?CMD=ArticleSearch&AU
TH=23
(Perhaps you'd care to rate the article before leaving the site, :)
Thanks.)

FAQs, companion products and other useful Project information can be seen
at
this web address: <http://www.mvps.org/project/>

Hope this helps - please let us know how you get on :)

Mike Glen
MS Project MVP

Manis wrote:
This is a problem that I'm having in my project.
The project plan was complete and we had all the dependencies set.
Many of them were start to finish. Now during the project, I'm
finding that many of the successor tasks are actually complete before
the predecessor!
I understand that the dependencies were setup wrong. The users say
that the dependencies are actually resource dependent instead of task
dependencies. For eg:- if a task is being executed by an experienced
resource, he has the required knowledge and does not have to wait for
the predecessor to be complete. Valid argument. The problem is that
the task has a generic resource against it. So, at the time of
planning, I don't know what kind of dependency to set. I elected to
use "start to finish". (Don't ask why.)
Question : If a successor is set as complete before the predecessor,
what happens to the dates?
if Task1, Task2 & Task3 are to be executed in that sequence and I
mark Task2 as complete before Task1, what happens to the plan for
Task1 and Task3?




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Resource vs. Task Dependency
    ... but I'm still trying to grasp the advantage of a>> resource "dependency" the functions like a task dependency does. ... >> Obviously they must be sequenced but the kicker in my mind is WHAT> sequence? ... >> You say one would be able to see timelines driven by task dependencies>> versus on driven by resource dependencies but I don't see how it could be>> possible that they are different. ... Critical path scheduling got it's big break from>>> the ...
    (microsoft.public.project)
  • Re: Dependencies and out of sequence scenario.
    ... Project can do is to calculate a schedule based on inputs provided by ... let's assume just 3 tasks and 1 resource. ... there is a start-no-earlier-than constraint on task 3. ... The project plan was complete and we had all the dependencies set. ...
    (microsoft.public.project)
  • Re: Dependencies and out of sequence scenario.
    ... Calculation is automatic. ... there is a start-no-earlier-than constraint on task 3. ... There should be no direct relationship between resources and dependencies. ... The logic should be set irrespective of the resource requirements. ...
    (microsoft.public.project)
  • Re: Resource planning (hours need per week, per project)
    ... BUT are you aware of how many people actually use dependencies to express ... relationships between resource assignments (even though it makes absolutely ... setting rather than a resource setting. ... Leveling and contouring are two completely different things. ...
    (microsoft.public.project)
  • Re: Changes not saved when altering dependency type
    ... I've stepped through your scenario and can reproduce what you report ... -Manually change link type through the Task Information dialog box. ... at the predecessor column you can see the dependencies are still ... Save the plan ...
    (microsoft.public.project)