Re: Just in Time levelling
- From: "John Sitka" <johnsitka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 08:47:35 -0400
They're not just about job scheduling, they're about Bills of Material and
versions thereof, Work in Process accounting, job costing, invoicing, links
to HR data bases, to general ledger...
I think that is the real problem. The act of scheduling dosen't have to be so close
coupled to those things. The product to produce is just a box of tasks.
These should be allowed to float freely within the resource pool without being
accountable to the traditional measures of progress,or tied to other things
like worker resident time.
The magic factory, raw materials in, finished goods out. Sit back and just enjoy the results.
Why do the accountants feel it is their responsiblity to peak inside the factory
and help decide how and when it is best to paint something?
(It will take me 2 hours to do this, 4 if you help)
Why are work cell managers held accountable for their efficiencies in isolation of what
goes out the back door?
(We are not a polishing company we are a shiny widget builder, to evaluate us based
on our polishing skill is rediculous. The gleam on our widgets is second to none. And we can have
your widgets ready for you fast and high quality, how many can I put you down for.)
The software dosen't exist becasue it wouldn't sell, because the scheduling idea for a vast
majority of the world is cost accounting based, not finished product efficiency based.
Operational measurement is cost accounting based not bottleneck erasure based.
"Jan De Messemaeker" <jandemes at prom hyphen ade dot be> wrote in message news:OGbJeEPWGHA.4292@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi John,
Just for once I disagree with you.
AXAPTA (from Microsoft now, used to be Navision) has an elaborate Production
management module.
BUT! Project specialists recommending the use of such a monster don't
realize the scale difference there is between Project and these tools.
They're not just about job scheduling, they're about Bills of Material and
versions thereof, Work in Process accounting, job costing, invoicing, links
to HR data bases, to general ledger...
I humbly admit that I very optimistically tried to get into this part of
AXAPTA and that I have given up.
So I do understand people who try to use Project for job scheduling. It's
very simple (as compared to the elusive production packages) and but for a
few weaknesses it can produce very sensible results. Just in time is one of
these weaknesses, an other one is the impossibility to manage material
resources and having their availability influence the schedule.
Greetings,
--
Jan De Messemaeker, Microsoft Project Most Valuable Professional
http://users.online.be/prom-ade/
For FAQs: http://www.mvps.org/project/faqs.htm
"John Sitka" <johnsitka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schreef in bericht
news:uezP6bOWGHA.3660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
davegb tells us they exist,news:1144247012.613574.105690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Google tells us they exist,
the software vendors tell us they exist.
Guess what, they don't exist.
"davegb" <davegb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
the
stoods wrote:
Thanks,
I do appreciate the replies.
Yes, we do need to do this.
The situation is a woodworking factory. The processes are typically cut
partsboard, edge the board, drill the board, paint the board and then put it
together. The bottleneck is in assembly, and teh saw can produce more
possible, youthan can be assembled. So, if all the sawing happens as soon as
they arehave to find somewhere to put all the parts that have been cut while
trade offwaiting to be assembled. So, it does make sense to do this. Also, it is
acceptable that all tasks become on teh critical path, that is the
rawneeded in this style of application.
I guess also on another level, you would also need to purchase all the
issues, asmaterials well in advance of needing them, cuasing more storage
necessarywell as incurring costs needlessly.
"Jan De Messemaeker" wrote:
Hi,
Project is very poor at that. As you may see, many claim it is not
environments);(whereas it is a generally accepted practice in production
you canmaybe that is why the requests to develop it aren't honored.
Let's be positive: if you can fix the date at the end of the chain
makeuse As Late As Possible constraints; if not you'll be condemned to
cannotmanual adjustments, sorry:-(
--
Jan De Messemaeker, Microsoft Project Most Valuable Professional
http://users.online.be/prom-ade/
For FAQs: http://www.mvps.org/project/faqs.htm
"stoods" <stoods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schreef in bericht
news:8CEAF96B-3907-4491-9BEB-E62E5C10406A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
Project is doing a great job of levelling teh resources, but I
currentlyfigure
out how to get project to just in time various tasks. It is
these tasksmoveing
tasks with a start as soon as possible, but it I want to delay
task 1 isuntil they are closer to the last task in a group of tasks. Ie,
can Ifollowed by task2 which is followed on by task 4 and so on. How
4?level
so that the start of task 1 minimises time between task 1 and task
Thanks,
Mike
You might consider looking at Production Scheduling software for your
situation. Project is primarily designed to do CP scheduling, something
you're not really doing. I would think, having no direct experience
with it, that production scheduling software would allow for JIT
processes, which Project doesn't do well. I Googled for production
scheduling software a week or so ago, and got lots of hits. I imagine
one of those products would serve you better.
Hope this helps in your world.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Just in Time levelling
- From: davegb
- Re: Just in Time levelling
- References:
- Re: Just in Time levelling
- From: Jan De Messemaeker
- Re: Just in Time levelling
- From: davegb
- Re: Just in Time levelling
- From: John Sitka
- Re: Just in Time levelling
- From: Jan De Messemaeker
- Re: Just in Time levelling
- Prev by Date: Re: multiple start-finish dependancies
- Next by Date: Re: MS Project certification
- Previous by thread: Re: Just in Time levelling
- Next by thread: Re: Just in Time levelling
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|