Re: 'Save As' with Resource Pool
From: SGM (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 05/18/04
- Next message: John: "Re: Deleting task and linking to predecessor"
- Previous message: John: "Re: Timescaled data"
- In reply to: John: "Re: 'Save As' with Resource Pool"
- Next in thread: JulieS: "Re: 'Save As' with Resource Pool"
- Reply: JulieS: "Re: 'Save As' with Resource Pool"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 07:56:56 -0700
Thanks John - this helps...The other reason I was
wondering about removing the links was a potential
performance hit, if the Pool is trying to maintain
references to multiple versions of the project schedule.
>-----Original Message-----
>
>SGM,
>The only potential problem I see is if the file "Save
As" is to a
>different location each time. Then it depends on whether
you need to
>preserve the pool link to an older version. If you need
to keep previous
>versions as backup, then the link to the pool should
remain. However, if
>you are simply using "Save As" to prevent file growth (a
good idea),
>then the "Save As" would be to the same path and there
is no impact on
>the resource pool link (i.e. no additional links are
created).
>
>Others may have their own opinion.
>
>Hope this helps.
>John
>.
>
- Next message: John: "Re: Deleting task and linking to predecessor"
- Previous message: John: "Re: Timescaled data"
- In reply to: John: "Re: 'Save As' with Resource Pool"
- Next in thread: JulieS: "Re: 'Save As' with Resource Pool"
- Reply: JulieS: "Re: 'Save As' with Resource Pool"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|