Re: Moving OLAP process

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance



Hello,

There is no technical reason for why you couldn't move this over, but
considering the number of projects you have, I would recommend you stick
with the three-server environment. If you wish to move to a two server
environment, you will need to consider the number of times/frequency of
which people will access the analysis services.

Sorry this may not be too helpful, but I would think you really do not want
to move to a two-server environment for performance reasons.

Regards,

-Bill

--
William Raymond [MS Project MVP]
projectnation@xxxxxxxxxxx
BLOG: http://www.mympa.org/blog.aspx


"wbbusby" <wbbusby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:B2D6BE56-7353-41D9-B1A0-B4E985C7302A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I currently have three servers in my Project Server 2003 environment. An
> application server, a database server and an analysis server. We've been
> considering moving to a two server configuration with an application
> server
> and a database/analysis server. My db/analysis server is a beefy dual 2.8
> processor HP blade server with 2 GB RAM and 148 GB of DASD (67 GB free). I
> have 516 projects and support approx 380 PWA users. Is there any reason I
> shouldn't be able to run my analysis server off this database server? Has
> anyone ever moved the analysis manager portion and got any advice on
> proceeding?


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: introducing SBS2008 into an existing WIN2003 (***NOT**** SBS2003) environment
    ... We are really hitting VMWare hard lately but I do not think that - for whatever reason - this is part of the plan for this client. ... I know...but this is a one server environment so I am not too worried about USN Rollback (I have 'corrected' that situation three or four times because we have - without consulting me - restored an image to a multi-DC ... Chris has the answer on getting SBS 08 in there, but having a nice little VM copy to resurect the forest is a nice to have ace in the hole. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Should DCs with DNS point to self first?
    ... > when you have all locally, by doing so IMO you're wasting server ... > good reason to do so IMO. ... there are far more issues associated with pointing a DC at itself for primary DNS than pointing at something else. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
  • Re: Recommended IMAP server
    ... Is there be any particular reason I should swap? ... pop3 mailboxes and passing it on to the imap server. ... > Trying to strip the HTML mail is quite a bit of a mess. ... tend to be much more attached to email clients. ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: Backup Failing
    ... Directory Service Access auditing is enabled. ... and then click Server Management. ... Click Edit to open Group Policy Object Editor. ... >>> Reason: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: XP App 1030 & Sys 40961 Errors
    ... This problem occurs because the Group Policy engine in Windows XP ... Professional and Windows Server 2003 does not have read permissions to the ... > cannot query for the list of Group Policy objects. ... > the reason for this was previously logged by the policy engine. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)