Re: Difference in using SQL Standard Edition and Enterprise Edition for EPM
From: Sumit (sumita_at_intelligroup.com)
Date: 04/21/04
- Next message: John: "Work Assignment - by Individual AND by team?"
- Previous message: Lars Hammarberg: "Re: Add "TEST" to PWA Home Page"
- In reply to: Microsoft News: "Re: Difference in using SQL Standard Edition and Enterprise Edition for EPM"
- Next in thread: Merijn Boom: "Re: Difference in using SQL Standard Edition and Enterprise Edition for EPM"
- Reply: Merijn Boom: "Re: Difference in using SQL Standard Edition and Enterprise Edition for EPM"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 04:41:05 -0700
Dear Merijn,
Thanks for your response.
Currently we are using EPM 2002 with SQL Ent Edition (basically a pilot run).
Post pilot, we are planning to deploy SQL only for EPM, but is there any benchmark document which can specify the difference that might be there by using Std edition and Ent Edition?
Also, could you elaborate as to why are you recommending to use EPM 2003? Ours is a functional organization where we are using EPM only for trakcing project's schedule. We have even not defined Skill or RBS, using it simply for schedule. Given the scenario would you still recommend 2003? If yes then why? Sorry for cross question but I need to be clear in my objective for using EPM 2003, right?
Regards,
Sumit.
- Next message: John: "Work Assignment - by Individual AND by team?"
- Previous message: Lars Hammarberg: "Re: Add "TEST" to PWA Home Page"
- In reply to: Microsoft News: "Re: Difference in using SQL Standard Edition and Enterprise Edition for EPM"
- Next in thread: Merijn Boom: "Re: Difference in using SQL Standard Edition and Enterprise Edition for EPM"
- Reply: Merijn Boom: "Re: Difference in using SQL Standard Edition and Enterprise Edition for EPM"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]