Re: Where is terminal services client in PPC 2003?
From: Sooner Al (SoonerAl_at_somewhere.net.invalid)
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 16:38:59 -0500
I think (but don't really know) it is a big issue with others, it is with me, along with the ability
to access alternative ports (versus the default port).
Just my $0.02 worth, which does not mean a whole lot...
I guess you can always tunnel through a VPN if your worried about security over the public
-- Al Jarvi (MS-MVP Windows Networking) Please post *ALL* questions and replies to the news group for the mutual benefit of all of us... The MS-MVP Program - http://mvp.support.microsoft.com This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights... "Al Blake" <email@example.com> wrote in message news:ORBZVNzeEHA.3428@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > Thanks Al (although it isnt what I wanted to hear). > Doesnt this seem like a *big* issue to anyone else? > Sysadmins (geeks) are just the sort of people that are > > a) gonna have a paocket device > b) gonna need to connect in remotely > > Do we want them to open TS sessions @ 56 bit? Worse we have to make the TS > server accept 56-bit from anyone........arent we going against all that > *security* focus that Microsoft is so keen to push by provigin a tool that > doesnt even support decent security? > I'm not a ppc programmer but how hard can it be to take an existing product, > add no functionality, but push up the encryption level? > > Has somone in M$ forgotten about this one in their security push? > > Al. > > "Sooner Al" <SoonerAl@somewhere.net.invalid> wrote in message > news:u9cXe#xeEHA.1764@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... >> Nope. None of the current Terminal Services Clients on PocketPCs are > 128-bit...:-( >> >> -- >> Al Jarvi (MS-MVP Windows Networking) >> > >