Re: Performance 5450 vs 2210

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry

From: BillR (billr_at_removethisbitmvps.org)
Date: 06/12/04 

Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 00:58:44 +1100

Reply to message from Marcus Erber <mNOSPAMerber@gmx.net> (Fri, 11 Jun 2004 03:07:27) about "Re: Performance 5450 vs 2210":

look at units with a pca270 processor. there are a few on the markrt now with more to come.

Bye
BillR <billr@removethisbitmvps.org>
Sun, 13 Jun 2004 00:38:38 +1100

=== Posted with Qusnetsoft NewsReader 2.1.0.8

----- Original Message -----
From: Marcus Erber <mNOSPAMerber@gmx.net>
Sent: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 03:07:27
Subject: Re: Performance 5450 vs 2210

Hi,

That makes sense! As you mentioned, I knew that both were running with
400MHz so I thought they might have the same processor built in.

In this case, I should get rid of the 5450 and buy another 2210 - would
save me a lot of money as well :-)

Do you know anything about the different displays? I have the impression
that the 5450 does flicker much less than the 2210?

bye
Marcus.

Jakub Kanczugowski wrote:

>>Any ideas what why this happens? Or how I can speed up my 5450?
>
>
> iPAQ 5450 has Intel X-Scale PXA250 processor and iPAQ 2210 has PXA255 - both
> running at 400MHz. But PXA255 is much faster. The PXA250 is so slow that
> even old devices with StrongARM 206MHz CPU have better performance.
>
> Unfortunately the only way to speed your device up is to use some software
> which will overclock the CPU. But the battery life will hurt then.
>
>