Re: Performance 5450 vs 2210
From: Marcus Erber (mNOSPAMerber_at_gmx.net)
Date: 06/10/04
- Next message: Bob S: "Re: Screen unresponsive"
- Previous message: George Styles: "Re: Quick SD card reader?"
- In reply to: Jakub Kanczugowski: "Re: Performance 5450 vs 2210"
- Next in thread: Jakub Kanczugowski: "Re: Performance 5450 vs 2210"
- Reply: Jakub Kanczugowski: "Re: Performance 5450 vs 2210"
- Reply: BillR: "Re: Performance 5450 vs 2210"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:07:27 GMT
Hi,
That makes sense! As you mentioned, I knew that both were running with
400MHz so I thought they might have the same processor built in.
In this case, I should get rid of the 5450 and buy another 2210 - would
save me a lot of money as well :-)
Do you know anything about the different displays? I have the impression
that the 5450 does flicker much less than the 2210?
bye
Marcus.
Jakub Kanczugowski wrote:
>>Any ideas what why this happens? Or how I can speed up my 5450?
>
>
> iPAQ 5450 has Intel X-Scale PXA250 processor and iPAQ 2210 has PXA255 - both
> running at 400MHz. But PXA255 is much faster. The PXA250 is so slow that
> even old devices with StrongARM 206MHz CPU have better performance.
>
> Unfortunately the only way to speed your device up is to use some software
> which will overclock the CPU. But the battery life will hurt then.
>
>
- Next message: Bob S: "Re: Screen unresponsive"
- Previous message: George Styles: "Re: Quick SD card reader?"
- In reply to: Jakub Kanczugowski: "Re: Performance 5450 vs 2210"
- Next in thread: Jakub Kanczugowski: "Re: Performance 5450 vs 2210"
- Reply: Jakub Kanczugowski: "Re: Performance 5450 vs 2210"
- Reply: BillR: "Re: Performance 5450 vs 2210"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
