Re: 802.11g and Pocket PCs



Helio,
thanks for your explanation why a .11g with a PDA should not
slow down everybody else.
>That was a radical answer.
I think David's rant deserved a radical answer.
David's post made me really angry. He totally sided with the
powers that be, where on a PPC support site he should consider
the PPC user's needs also.
I mean, ianpower wasn't asking about doing something illegal
(as far as I can see). Maybe the IT people of his university
just don't care. (I remember when my daughter wanted to do PPP
dial-up with a Mac at the University of Kansas. They had the whole
thing on a disk for PCs, but nothing for Macs. But a least they
gave us a list of utility programs needed to use it with a Mac.
So they didn't 'officially' support it, but you where welcome to try.)

None of the people who replied to ianpower's post answered his
question. I DO have the Linksys WCF54G card, but I did not reply
because I only connect to .11b sites. At home I have a WAP11 and
on the road I connect to freespots in NY (parks and libraries mainly)
and occasionally to t-mobile (Starbucks, Borders) and Wayport (B&N,
McDonalds). None of these require .11g. I might have latched on to
somebody's .11g only network, because on Manhattan on any given
steetcorner you end up getting a half a dozen unprotected networks
on the "wireless networks:" screen. But freeloading on somebody's
network is not my game.
I can understand ianpower's concern: who want's to be stuck with a
~$90 Dollar card, that's not suitable for the job. Sorry I can't
help you, ian. Maybe you find a dealer, who'll let you return the card
if it doesn't work for your situation. It's a nice card tho, I like
the utility that comes with it. I don't have the Ambicom .11g card,
but all my other AmbiCom cards work fine (CF modem, .11b CF Wifi card
and a FM radio card - cute)
Have a nice day, y'all.
Hope you have a better day, David.
Klaus Ernst, NYC
"Helio Diamant - MS-MVP/Mobile Devices" <helio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote in message news:erhtQOHrFHA.3424@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> That was a radical answer.
>
> I don't like to adopt radicalism in any field of my life. It gets me stuck
> on the past and prevents me to advance in life.
>
> Luckily chipmakers know how to sync and buffer internal communications
> within a device bus with external communications with a network. Otherwise
> we would never get to where we are today. Pluging a 802.11b card to a
> 802.11g network today brings immediately the whole network to 802.11b
> compliant speeds, even before the card began doing something. This is why
> networks are being closed to b cards. The card in question will prevent
this
> effect from happening, and probably the effect of the PPC bus on the
network
> will be nill due to the sync and buffer work done within the card. BTW,
> linksys is already doing it very successfully.
>
> --
> Helio Diamant
> MS-MVP/Mobile Devices
> www.pocketpcfreak.com
>
> "David {MVP}" <dhettel@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:%23nYOSi9qFHA.3604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Perhaps that is because the university has found that "B" network cards
> > slow the university network down, do to the frequent need to wait for
the
> > "B" device to catch up? So IMHO it does seem relevant, if you add a "G"
> > device that can NOT function at "G" speeds, what will this do to the
> > university's network? As I recall when "G" cards first came out they
where
> > all cardbus cards, because it was claimed at the time a 16 bit data bus
> > could not work at these speeds. To the best of my knowledge all PCMCIA
"G"
> > cards are still card bus cards. So you add a device to a network that is
> > not yours, and is not approved, and it has a detrimental effect on the
> > network, what are the consequences?
> >
> > Sorry I don't buy that my wants are more important than someone else's
> > needs. I want to access your network, and because I don't care about
your
> > network, anything that allows me to do this is OK? That's wrong. Sure
> > perhaps one will not make much of a difference, but at some point the
> > cumulative effect will begin to make a difference. If I choose to launch
a
> > software program that slows a university network down, I am call a
hacker.
> > If I simply obtain a DHCP address from a network, that I do not have
> > permission to access, I may go to jail. Chances are with this device,
you
> > are increasing network traffic, thereby slowing down the network, and
also
> > obtaining a DHCP address for a device you are not authorized to use on
the
> > network. That could look real good on your resume, couldn't it?
> >
> > --
> > David {MVP}
> > Microsoft Mobile Devices
> > Mobile AntiVirus Researchers Association
> >
> > Please post *ALL* questions and replies to the news group for the mutual
> > benefit of all of us...
> > The MS-MVP Program - http://mvp.support.microsoft.com
> > The MARA Program - http://www.mobileav.org/index.html
> >
> > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> > rights...
> >
> >
> > Spelling and grammar errors left in for those that need a little joy in
> > their life by correcting me.
> >
> > "Sooner Al [MVP]" <SoonerAl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:%23AdWJB9qFHA.3788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> The real point is that apparently the original posters university
network
> >> only accepts 802.11g connections...:-)
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Al Jarvi (MS-MVP Windows Networking)
> >>
> >> Please post *ALL* questions and replies to the news group for the
mutual
> >> benefit of all of us...
> >> The MS-MVP Program - http://mvp.support.microsoft.com
> >> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> >> rights...
> >>
> >>
> >> "David {MVP}" <dhettel@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:OAuZi48qFHA.528@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Hmm.....
> >>> Ok So I'll ask, what does a "G" card mean, when we are talking about
> >>> Pocket PCs? I do not believe any current Pocket PC has the ability to
> >>> move data from a card to a memory storage device at anything
approaching
> >>> "G" speeds. Let alone the hyper speeds that many "G" cards claim now.
> >>>
> >>> So the card fires up and tells the network it can handle "G" speeds,
and
> >>> then tells the network to stop sending, because it needs to write to
the
> >>> PocketPC memory. I have yet to hear of a Pocket PC that is as fast as
a
> >>> PC based 802.11b connection. So if a PocketPC can't keep up with an
> >>> 802.11b connection, I have a hard time seeing it connect at 802.11g
> >>> speeds. Does adding a "G" card to a Pocket PC, gain any performance,
or
> >>> does it actually slow down more than with a "B" card, do to more
> >>> frequent need to say I'm not ready? As the normal DSL or cable user
does
> >>> not have a Internet connection speed that will tax a 802.11b
connection,
> >>> or even really take advantage of the speed the 802.11b connection
> >>> offers, what is the real point?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> David {MVP}
> >>> Microsoft Mobile Devices
> >>> Mobile AntiVirus Researchers Association
> >>>
> >>> Please post *ALL* questions and replies to the news group for the
mutual
> >>> benefit of all of us...
> >>> The MS-MVP Program - http://mvp.support.microsoft.com
> >>> The MARA Program - http://www.mobileav.org/index.html
> >>>
> >>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> >>> rights...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Spelling and grammar errors left in for those that need a little joy
in
> >>> their life by correcting me.
> >>>
> >>> "Helio Diamant - MS-MVP/Mobile Devices"
<helio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> wrote in message news:uFDmIn6qFHA.2212@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> Soon there will be also a "short" G card by Spectec. The product is
at
> >>>> last development levels and should be released before the end of the
> >>>> year.
> >>>>
> >>>> It will have WPA support, as their B card has.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Helio Diamant
> >>>> MS-MVP/Mobile Devices
> >>>> www.pocketpcfreak.com
> >>>>
> >>>> "Sooner Al [MVP]" <SoonerAl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >>>> news:%23$mlWJoqFHA.1096@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>> The comment I have is the Linksys card does *NOT* have WPA support.
> >>>>> There is a new card from Ambicom that does have WPA support.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://www.ambicom.com/products/wave2net/wl54-cf.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I also believe Sony is/has come out with a CF form factor 802.11g
> >>>>> card.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Note that I have not used any of these cards...so as
always...YMMV...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Al Jarvi (MS-MVP Windows Networking)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please post *ALL* questions and replies to the news group for the
> >>>>> mutual benefit of all of us...
> >>>>> The MS-MVP Program - http://mvp.support.microsoft.com
> >>>>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> >>>>> rights...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> <ianpower@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >>>>> news:1125062939.167440.162870@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>> I'm surprised that there hasn't been more discussion about the
> >>>>>> 802.11g
> >>>>>> CF card offered by Linksys.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Can anyone confirm that they are successfully using this card with
a
> >>>>>> PPC? The University that I am attending has blocked 802.11b
> >>>>>> connections
> >>>>>> (hence I can't use my PPC's built in WiFi - which is 802.11b - to
> >>>>>> connect). I think the reasoning for this has something to do with
the
> >>>>>> fact that a single 802.11b connection can slow the whole network
> >>>>>> down.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In any event, I haven't been able to use my PPC on campus, but have
> >>>>>> been waiting for an SD or CF card that supports 802.11g. Now that
> >>>>>> it's
> >>>>>> here I'm thinking about giving it a try -- even though it's not
> >>>>>> "officially" supported by the university.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> But it's not cheap, and I'd like to make sure it's going to work
> >>>>>> before
> >>>>>> I shell out the cash.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Any comments?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: network configuration problems
    ... lsattr -El ent1 gives ... bus_mem_addr 0xd0000 Bus memory address False ... Network address 02608C2DC756 ... And yes I can ping the address of the card. ...
    (comp.unix.aix)
  • Re: WAP54Gs with WPA not handing out IPs from SBS2003 server
    ... Do you have enough IP addresses in the DHCP pool on the DHCP server? ... There's not even 50 machines total on the network. ... I'll assume you're running Windoze XP Home using Wireless Zero Config ... With the PCMCIA card, it's the WZC software. ...
    (alt.internet.wireless)
  • Re: WAP54Gs with WPA not handing out IPs from SBS2003 server
    ... Do you have enough IP addresses in the DHCP pool on the DHCP server? ... There's not even 50 machines total on the network. ... I'll assume you're running Windoze XP Home using Wireless Zero Config ... With the PCMCIA card, it's the WZC software. ...
    (alt.internet.wireless)
  • Re: Lan-Tech Netork of 255 ap2s and Siders etc
    ... a way to get mastery development network up... ... Original manual, 1 file server card, 8 expansion ... if you have a mastery development card it has a menu in the eprom that comes ...
    (comp.sys.apple2)
  • Group Policy loading
    ... connected in to the network. ... wireless newsgroup) that Group Policy is just timing out. ... >>latest Dell and Buffalo firmware and drivers but to no ... >>file to match that of the Dell TrueMobile card. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.group_policy)

Quantcast